Hi mac users,
This time for the first time a Hugin bundle with an OpenMP(1) enabled
version of enblend and enfuse. It's a 32bit version of svn 5102. Until now
backward compatibility with Tiger was our (my) most important driver to not
use an OpenMP enabled version as OpenMP is only supported on Le
Hi Thomas!
Thanks for your explanations.
On 2 Apr., 16:53, "T. Modes" wrote:
> No, that was not the indention. We want to keep the make file approach
> for stitching. The make file is created in
> PanoramaMakefileExport::createMakefile. But this method mixes
> stitching logic with make file syn
Hi Antoine,
> Now, about the task "Ability to read and write .pto projects".
>
> For the writing part, I guess the idea would be, for example, to directly
> write info found by Panomatic in the current .pto file, using Hugin's
> function printPanoramaScript(..). Exactly like autopano-sift-c does
Hi Flo,
> While writing that patch was easy, it made me explore how the panorama
> build process works at all.
> I found it rather interesting/confusing how the two buttons "Stitch
> Now" and "..send to batch" finally end up creating a makefile, but
> taking two completely different ways of gettin
Hi Flo,
First your vetting exercise is ok. I commited it to the trunk.
> Of course it did. I didn'nt mention, that i checked out the 2010.0.0
> release from svn, not the trunk.
> So the patches are based on that release. (Should I use the trunk
> instead?)
Okay, I understand.The trunk contains s
Hi everybody !
As Bruno suggested to me I looked at the pto2mk command line, and especially
the way it's managing .pto files. I'll first briefly summarize what I got
from this, and then ask a few questions :)
As far as I understood, pto2mk uses the function loadPTScript(...)
implemented in /hugin
Simon Oosthoek schrieb am 02.04.10 10:10:
> I tried twice to respond to the Repository thread, but my e-mail never
> arrived, what's going on?
Spam filter hickup... Google somehow regarded your reply as a
"suspicious message", so all new messages from you were being held in
the moderation queue be
Hi Yuv
Yuval Levy wrote:
I think it should be the other way around. The choice of DVCS is more critical
than the choice of code hosting provider; and it is also more critical than
the choice of bug tracker and other tools which can also be hosted at
different providers. Hosting is an interchan
Hi Yuv
Yuval Levy wrote:
I think it should be the other way around. The choice of DVCS is more critical
than the choice of code hosting provider; and it is also more critical than
the choice of bug tracker and other tools which can also be hosted at
different providers. Hosting is an interchan
I tried twice to respond to the Repository thread, but my e-mail never
arrived, what's going on?
/Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
