Thanks again for your help ;-)
I attached my patch to this e-mail. It only concerns the panomatic-lib
directory. Note that I wrote it on the Pablo's variation of the lib that I
got by bzr branch lp:~pablo.dangelo/hugin/panomatic-lib. Therefore the patch
also include the correction of a bug in CMak
Hi Ryan...
It shouldn't fail because it wasn't necessary.
There is more to the issue.
Yeh, I just guessed, too many people make work for nothing.
Best regards, John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A
On Apr 7, 10:49 pm, "John McAllister" wrote:
> Why are you trying to exposure optimise a scene series that probably doesn't
> need it?
Well, in the preview window it looked like it *did* need it, but the
stitched result actually does look fine as you predict. This leaves
some questions, though:
Hi Dezen,
Hugin compiles fine on windows. (VS2008, CMake 2.8.0)
If you are not so experienced with compiling (as I assume from your
questions), it's the best to start with the SDK.
You cited an older version of the SDK. Follow the link on
http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SD
On Thu 08-Apr-2010 at 00:19 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Thu 08-Apr-2010 at 00:15 +0200, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
Here is the patch that I have proposed earlier.
Thanks, it builds here (centos4 Linux) but I get a segfault when I
open the fast preview window. It may be a local problem, I'l
Hello everybody,
I could not manage to compile Hugin on Windows XP Pro SP2 32 bit.
Using:
MS Visual Studio 2005
CMake 2.8
gettext package
boost 1.4.2
ilmbase 1.0.1
libpano 13-2.9.14
openexr-1.6.1
wxWidgets 2.8.10
Followed all the instructions from:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windo
I figured out what I did wrong when I took up the process again: my
lens focal length input was wrong. I noticed the the FOV for each
section of the image had a different value, even though I put in the
same focal length - that's what caused the misalignment and warping of
the edges.
It's actually
Thanks for your infos, Yuv.
So if you guys like it, I'll leave the proposal as it is. Deadline is
coming soon.
To allow replacement of make in the future, I'll take it as guideline
to limit dependencies on make
in the parts that don't need it (stitching logic ..).
Flo
--
You received this messa
Hi,
I wrote the additional proposal for the zooming for the fast preview
idea on the wiki.
Its available at:
pdf:http://wiki.panotools.org/File:Proposal-zooming.pdf
wiki:
http://wiki.panotools.org/User:Dmakreshanski/GSOC-zooming-proposal
google:
http://socghop.appsp
Consider another pano stitcher. I too have had issues with blurred images
sometimes one in the center of the whole batch.
I found that Autostitch or Autopano Pro are able to handle these.
Dale
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:28:48 -0400
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Stitching blurred images
From: nic
> then your friend is "hg diff" instead of "svn diff". or more generally, if you
> made changes against any folder structure that is not under version control,
> "diff".
>
panomaticlib is in a bazaar repository. Also "bzr diff" (to make the
confusion complete ;-)
Thomas
--
You received this mes
another thing that may help along the same line of exchanging image sets prior
to stitching: run all the images through some really extreme sharpening /
unsharp mask filter, or whatever other filter that produces predictable
results with distinguishable features out of the blur. run the CP gener
On April 8, 2010 02:33:53 am Antoine Deleforge wrote:
> Concerning the patch: the problem is that I only modified files in
> /panomtic-lib/panomatic/. I'm not sure that it is linked to any subversion
> directory, is it?
then your friend is "hg diff" instead of "svn diff". or more generally, if you
On 7 April 2010 23:42, ORFrankOR wrote:
> I'd been having trouble with v 2009, so I downloaded and installed v
> 2010 and ran it on an existing image that I divided into two parts.
> The result, while OK in the image area, shows misalignment of the
> border frame and distortion of the edges and ed
How about shooting the same set twice? Let's assume your light meter
shows 1/500sec @ f2.8, so for each frame a second exposure could be shot
with 1/15sec @ f16. Maybe this is doable with a bracketing setting,
otherwise I'd try tethered shooting. My macro lens even allows to be
stopped down to
I'd been having trouble with v 2009, so I downloaded and installed v
2010 and ran it on an existing image that I divided into two parts.
The result, while OK in the image area, shows misalignment of the
border frame and distortion of the edges and edge and corner toning
that resembles vignetting.
16 matches
Mail list logo
