[hugin-ptx] Re: Adobe lens profile creator

I looked into the lens models in some detail a while back, and they are not the same. Adobe is using r^2, r^4 and r^6 distortion coefficients, plus tangential distortion. This is likely identical to Bouguet's camera calibration, at http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/ Hugin uses r, r^2

[hugin-ptx] [OSX] Hugin 2010.1.0 svn5156 32/64-bit bundle

Hi mac users, A new 32/64-bit bundle. Tiger users should use the Tiger versions of enblend/enfuse as can be found in the "enblend-enfuse-4.0" folder in the dmg. In this bundle: * more fixes/enhancements by Thomas Modes * Pablo's patent free panomatic still as 32bit build as the 64bit build segf

[hugin-ptx] [OSX] PTBatcherGui 2010.1.0 svn 5156 bundles

Hi mac users, I built 2 new PTBatcherGui bundles, a 32bit Tiger bundle (PTBatcherGui-mac-Tiger-2010.1.0-svn5156) and a 32/64bit (Snow)Leopard bundle (PTBatcherGui-mac-2010.1.0-svn5156). As the PTBatcherGui bundle does not allow an external enblend and enfuse, I created a 32bit Tiger bundle with t

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Adobe lens profile creator

I agree it would be useful. If so, I'd laminate the target for use in the pool :-) Well this one got some math in it: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/lensprofile_creator/lensprofile_creator_cameramodel_dataconversion.pdf But why not try it out empirically? Calibrate your lens with Adobe'

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows 64-bit Build

I've just tried 5154, and get the following when running cmake: CMake Error at CMakeModules/FindGLUT.cmake:87 (MESSAGE): Could not find GLUT Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:184 (FIND_PACKAGE) By default, the x64 builds of freeglut end up at: \freeglut-2.6.0\VisualStudi

[hugin-ptx] Re: batch process on different machine

On May 13, 3:05 pm, Bruno Postle wrote: > On the other machine run the stitch using the command-line: > >     cd /path/to/folder >     make -f project.pto.mk thanks, this is exactly what i was looking for. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows 64-bit Build

Got the version, will test it through the weekend! Thanks! BTW, I brought panomatic to 64 bit. if you want the code and\or the exe, don't hesitate. For my it enabled using the 4 cores on large images. nick On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Tom Glastonbury wrote: > A number of people have asked

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows 64-bit Build

2010/5/14 Tom Glastonbury > A number of people have asked to try out this build, so here it is: > > http://tg73.net/2010/05/hugin-windows-x64-64-bit-build/ > > I'd like to hear from any active developers/admins at the Sourceforge > project about the possibility of getting the changes mentioned in

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows 64-bit Build

A number of people have asked to try out this build, so here it is: http://tg73.net/2010/05/hugin-windows-x64-64-bit-build/ I'd like to hear from any active developers/admins at the Sourceforge project about the possibility of getting the changes mentioned in my original post checked in, and upda

Re: [hugin-ptx] batch process on different machine

Hi all, 2010/5/14 Harry van der Wolf > Hi Allan, > > > 2010/5/14 AKS-Gmail-IMAP > > I see .mk files on projects saved by Hugin Windows but not on Hugin OS X. >> Is that intentional? >> >> Allan >> >> >> On May 13, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: >> >> Save your project, Hugin writes bot

Re: [hugin-ptx] batch process on different machine

Hi Allan, 2010/5/14 AKS-Gmail-IMAP > I see .mk files on projects saved by Hugin Windows but not on Hugin OS X. > Is that intentional? > > Allan > > > On May 13, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: > > Save your project, Hugin writes both a .pto project file and a > .pto.mkMakefile that can