Found another paper, this one includes GPL source code:
http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/photomontage/
video shows masking out of unwanted elements from a sequence of images
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic soft
Excellent work. I'll be sure to visit the Strahov Monastery Library the next
time I'm in Prague. Congratulations, you made it onto wired.com:
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2011/03/strahov-monastery-panoramic-image/?pid=3251&pageid=64399.
-Jeff
--
You received this message because you are s
s possible after the
submission/acceptance."...
I invited Zeev to join us and provided the link to this thread too.
Anyway here is the source code for MVC he provided to me by email:
http://www.diy-streetview.org/data/development/20110329/MVCDemo_by_Zeev_Farbman.zip
Jan
On Tue, Mar 29,
On Mar 29, 12:12 pm, Agos wrote:
> the results are indeed very impressive. I'll leave to those who know math to
> say if this could really be useful for hugin :)
Yeah, I don't understand the math either! But it looks like they are
solving the laplace portion in a different way that's faster. I
On 11-03-29 01:48 AM, kfj wrote:
Interesting abstract. I couldn't get the full paper downloaded,
though. Just an empty page came up :(
The link is a bit slow, but the full paper is definitely there; try
right clicking and "Save link as".
Very cool stuff.
Cheers,
BBB
--
Bob Bright
Vancouve
On 26 March 2011 16:42, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On March 26, 2011 06:05:56 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> I'll branch out the repository when (and if) the proposed changes get
>> their way to upstream. Till that the branch would be useless.
>
> I beg to differ. Branching in Hg is extremely cheap. Bran
the results are indeed very impressive. I'll leave to those who know math to
say if this could really be useful for hugin :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is avai
Hi Everybody,
Just thought you might enjoy this
http://www.360cities.net/gigapixel/strahov-library.html
It wasn't made with Hugin though. Maybe when I can get cpfind to reduce
images to a specified pixel size ;-)))
seriously though, I would like to make one of the next ones using hugin,
Awesome!
I for one am happy to hear that someone is interested in working on vertical
line detection. I review tons of panos (stitched by hundreds of people all
over the world) every day, and lots of them are not level. This task is
currently quite difficult and non-intuitive for people, and it
On 29 Mrz., 01:32, kevin wrote:
> Not sure if people have seen this paper yet:
>
> http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~danix/mvclone/
>
> Found it by looking at Gimp's Google Summer of code. They state in
> the video that using their method they can stitch images in just a few
> seconds.
Interesting abs
On 29 Mrz., 09:56, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
> I like the idea, but it seems overly complex (and expensive) to me, to be
> honest. And won't work in cases when the FOV is unknown.
I am only using my experience with my script to argue your point that
tailoring the CPGs
On 28 Mrz., 23:27, KenO wrote:
> Can Hugin use RAW photos?
I'd like to shed a slightly different light on the topic. Why does
anyone want to process RAW in hugin? There are different motivations:
- to wrench the last bit of quality from the images that would be lost
in a TIFF: the green channel
I've contacted a professor here at CVUT (the czech technical university) and
asked if any students might be interested in participating.
People at CVUT invented MSER
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximally_stable_extremal_regions and is very
highly regarded in the realm of computer vision.
--
Hi Kay,
I like the idea, but it seems overly complex (and expensive) to me, to be
honest. And won't work in cases when the FOV is unknown.
My idea is much, much more simple.
Couldn't we start with my idea? ;-)
Or, if I convinced someone (say one of my colleagues who is a competent
programmer)
Agree, RAW input for stitching is a bad idea. At the very least you want to
set white balance on your raw images (although it's true hugin can fix white
balance, this is not ideal)
Even if Hugin did have raw input, it would simply use dcraw for this most
probably. I'm not in favor of adding thi
So can Autopano Giga not sure if anyone here has used it lately but you
can throw a 40-image handheld series of shots at it, and it will align it in
a few seconds. Rendering is a different issue, although it is also
incredibly fast in comparison to hugin and ptgui, and it has "smart"
blendi
On 28 Mrz., 23:55, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the --fullscale flag in cpfind is ok, but really makes no sense considering
> the size of input images could vary by huge amounts.
>
> wouldn't it make more sense to have a setting for the target pixel size that
> cpfind shoul
17 matches
Mail list logo
