Hello Michail,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 23:41:38 +1000, Michail S. wrote:
I like this idea, but does hugin automagically understand that black
parts
of partially stiched images are 'void' instead of solid black color?
I don't think it should be a problem. Any 'black' areas in the subpanos
sho
I don't know if you have some scripting skills, but I plan to do a
gigapixel panorama some day and sometimes I reflect about how to do this.
The difference is that I will probably try to split the job and generate
the tile pictures for being seen with some panorama viewer like Salado
Player or krpa
I like this idea, but does hugin automagically understand that black parts
of partially stiched images are 'void' instead of solid black color?
One approach I would consider, if it is possible, is to split your images
> up into a number of smaller panos, stitch those and save in
> equirect
> If you can get me access to the images somehow, I could attempt on my
> side. Maybe the resized images in dropbox?
>
>
I've converted images into JPEG's, and now they take mere 2.3Gb. When
sorted alphabetically, images starts from top left corner, and then goes
horisontally.
http://s.14.b
Hello Michail,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:11:42 +1000, Michail S. wrote:
[snip]
Any suggestions on how should I attack this problem?
I am likely to need to repeat this panorama shooting & stitching 3 more
times, and I already feel the pain.
One approach I would consider, if it is possible, is t
Hallo Michail,
Thursday, May 30, 2013, 8:11:42 AM, you wrote:
Michail>I am using Huging to stitch microscope photos into larger panoramas.
Michail>And usually for up to 100 shots it works very well - as my stage has
manual
Michail>But few days ago I tried to stitch 831 images together. That was s
On 29 May 2013 08:55, Gnome Nomad wrote:
> I do believe Hugin has a way to merge different exposures into a single
> image. I've done it but don't presently recall how.
Yes, it has. Either select the "High dynamic range output", which
merges images with different exposures into a single HDR image
paul womack wrote:
Michail S. wrote:
Hi,
I am using Huging to stitch microscope photos into larger panoramas.
And usually for up to 100 shots it works very well - as my stage has manual XY
controls, I disable rotation optimization, and getting perfect results.
This sounds like our friend "mos
Michail S. wrote:
Hi,
I am using Huging to stitch microscope photos into larger panoramas.
And usually for up to 100 shots it works very well - as my stage has manual XY
controls, I disable rotation optimization, and getting perfect results.
This sounds like our friend "mosaic stitching" again
On Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:33:01 AM UTC+2, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hello,
>
> I'm already doubting for a couple of weeks to release either a beta2 or an
> RC1, but as there are still some issues with the OS X build due to the new
> wxWindows 2.9.x (necessary for a full 64bit a
Hi,
I am using Huging to stitch microscope photos into larger panoramas.
And usually for up to 100 shots it works very well - as my stage has manual
XY controls, I disable rotation optimization, and getting perfect results.
But few days ago I tried to stitch 831 images together. That was so epic
11 matches
Mail list logo
