Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin faster?

2013-06-12 Thread Stefan Peter
Hi cls On 12.06.2013 07:51, cspiel wrote: Stefan - Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 22:59:58 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Peter: enblend-mp --compression=LZW -m 8192 -w -f57402x2322+0+223 -o test_.tif ... make: *** [test_.tif] Segmentation fault (core dumped) If you do a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 06/11/2013 12:26 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM UTC-7, Bruno Postle wrote: On Tue 01-May-2012 at 03:35 -0700, AlekseyM wrote: What library Hugin uses to create tiff files? Maybe it is possible to add some options to specify different tiff format?

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com On 06/11/2013 12:26 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM UTC-7, Bruno Postle wrote: On Tue 01-May-2012 at 03:35 -0700, AlekseyM wrote: What library Hugin uses to create tiff files? Maybe it is possible to add

Re: [hugin-ptx] How can I save stitched image as JPEG

2013-06-12 Thread Carl von Einem
Zaw Hein Myat schrieb am 12.06.13 07:10: I am quite new to Hugin. I cant able to get the JPEG file after I did the stitching. Every time I only can save as .Pto file. So how can I save it as JPEG format, Thank. This the way I did Under Assist Tab: 1) Load the Image then 2) The Align then 3)

Re: [hugin-ptx] How can I save stitched image as JPEG

2013-06-12 Thread Zaw Hein Myat
ok. thank. i will try. On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:00:11 PM UTC+8, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: 2013/6/12 Zaw Hein Myat zaw...@ctrlworks.com javascript: Hi; I am quite new to Hugin. I cant able to get the JPEG file after I did the stitching. Every time I only can save as .Pto file. So

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 06/11/2013 10:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: 2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com mailto:gnomeno...@gmail.com On 06/11/2013 12:26 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM UTC-7, Bruno Postle wrote: On Tue 01-May-2012 at 03:35 -0700,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com On 06/11/2013 10:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: 2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com mailto:gnomeno...@gmail.com On 06/11/2013 12:26 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM UTC-7, Bruno Postle wrote:

Re: [hugin-ptx] So long to do 90 photo stitching

2013-06-12 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
You can put enblend to use more memory with the option -m XXX where XXX would be the amount of memory in kbytes, like 6000 for 6GB. You can put it in hugin in the preferences window. After opening it go to the Programs tab and put the -m XXX text on the Default Arguments for the Enblend program.

Re: [hugin-ptx] So long to do 90 photo stitching

2013-06-12 Thread Zaw Hein Myat
Thank for ur advise. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Isaac Gouy
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:58:18 AM UTC-7, GnomeNomad wrote: GIMP only complains about them being 16-bit per channel. I think GIMP (like Photoshop) is intended for a broader audience than just photographers. (Full suite of painting tools including Brush, Pencil, Airbrush, Clone,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/6/12 Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:58:18 AM UTC-7, GnomeNomad wrote: GIMP only complains about them being 16-bit per channel. I think GIMP (like Photoshop) is intended for a broader audience than just photographers. (Full suite of painting tools

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin faster?

2013-06-12 Thread Donald Johnston
I'm using 2013.0.0.6320:53691abbeb55 built by Matthieu DESILE. I changed the Programs to the -mp and was told they weren't there. Are these part of the build for the Mac version? On 2013-06-11, at 12:23 AM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote: Just to make sure: I assume you

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin faster?

2013-06-12 Thread Harry van der Wolf
The Mac OS X versions of enfuse and enblend are solely openmp enabled builds. There is no difference. Therefore they are simply called enblend and enfuse. If you check inside a terminal in /Applications/Hugin/HuginTools (or where you installed Hugin) and you do an enblend -Vv, you will see that

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?

2013-06-12 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 06/11/2013 11:08 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: 2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com On 06/11/2013 10:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: 2013/6/12 Gnome Nomad On 06/11/2013 12:26 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM

[hugin-ptx] List sig (was:What's wrong Hugin tiff implementation?)

2013-06-12 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 09:23 -1000, Gnome Nomad wrote: Does anyone know why we receive what look like TWO slightly different list sigs like this at the bottom? Maybe someone could combine the two and reduce the extraneous line count a bit? Google seem to have grown it over the years. I've

Re: [hugin-ptx] List sig

2013-06-12 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 23:03 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 09:23 -1000, Gnome Nomad wrote: Does anyone know why we receive what look like TWO slightly different list sigs like this at the bottom? Maybe someone could combine the two and reduce the extraneous line count a bit?