22.9.2016, 6.12, Greg 'groggy' Lehey kirjoitti:
>
> At least I have the information now, but unless nona or enblend are
> hiding something, there's no evidence of any large files being written
> to the temporary directory, so you might as well reset the preference
> so that you don't have to
[resequenced]
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 20:24:31 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>>
>> At least I have the information now, but unless nona or enblend are
>> hiding something, there's no evidence of any large files
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>
> My guess is that whatever the problem was,
> it has gone into hiding.
>
>
but the problem is that when I give it a custom temporary directory none of
the control point detectors work.
And I meant before/after
but the problem is that when I give it a custom temporary directory none of
the control point detectors work.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:53:25 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:53:25 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:38:36 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
>>> In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in
>>>
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:56:23 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:50:10 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>>
>> I did specify 'ls -l'. If you look at those files, I think you'll
>> find they're in the order of 10 kB each.
>
> $ ls -l /home/bmike1/hugintmp
>
I cancelled my large stitcch and stitched something small together.
this is before I started the stitch:
> bmike1@MikesBeast ~/hugintmp $ ls -l /tmp
>> total 16
>> srwxr-xr-x 1 bmike1 bmike10 Sep 21 15:15 gedit.bmike1.2619256144
>> drwx-- 2 bmike1 bmike1 4096 Sep 21 17:04
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:50:10 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>
> I did specify 'ls -l'. If you look at those files, I think you'll
> find they're in the order of 10 kB each.
>
$ ls -l /home/bmike1/hugintmp
total 100
-rw--- 1 bmike1 bmike1 419 Sep 20 17:59 hec1QPQW
-rw---
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:38:36 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> > In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in
> > "/home/bmike1/hugintmp"
> > In the same location if /home/bmike1/hugintmp is
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:39:13 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> I didn't do your ls command because it is stitching in the hugintmp
> directory right now.
>
>> /hugintmp $ ls /home/bmike1/hugintmp
> hec1QPQW heFan8Hr heL3W456 huginpto_0vYcMe huginpto_95itzG
> huginpto_UEq4Vb
>
I didn't do your ls command because it is stitching in the hugintmp
directory right now.
~/hugintmp $ ls /home/bmike1/hugintmp
hec1QPQW heFan8Hr heL3W456 huginpto_0vYcMe huginpto_95itzG
huginpto_UEq4Vb
hee6TKlX hehyqyzB heMNMrcf huginpto_2c8gZv huginpto_HYTJTG
huginpto_ZuLc6q
--
A
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in
> "/home/bmike1/hugintmp"
> In the same location if /home/bmike1/hugintmp is present when I search for
> control points it will fail.
We seem to be going round in
On Sunday, 18 September 2016 at 1:02:51 -0700, T. Modes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> today we are releasing the final version of Hugin 2016.2.
I have now committed the FreeBSD port. The package should become
available in a day or two.
If you find anything wrong with this port, the correct way to
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:22:48 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>
> > Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching.
>
> Where? Take a look in your specified directory and see what's in
> there.
>
In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in
"/home/bmike1/hugintmp"
In
In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in
"/home/bmike1/hugintmp"
In the same location if /home/bmike1/hugintmp is present when I search for
control points it will fail.
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 10:28:54 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote:
>
> or at least of a dome pano
[sequence recovered]
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:09:15 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote:
>>
>> Good idea, but so far we have no evidence that anything is being
>> written to /tmp or wherever. That's what I've been trying
I don't know where the intermediate files are saved whether it is /tmp
or elsewhere. When I was working on this issue 6 months ago someone said it
was /tmp so I just went with that.
Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4,
I don't know where the intermediate files are saved whether it is /tmp
or elsewhere. When I was working on this issue 6 months ago someone said it
was /tmp so I just went with that.
Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4,
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 21:00:56 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote:
> On 20.09.2016 13:32, Michael Havens wrote:
>> Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even though no control points were
>> found.
>
> Then it is of no use. The task at hand is to find out why there are no
> control points
On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 10:57:57 +1000, Terry Duell wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:45:29 +1000, Michael Havens
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote:
>>>
>>> In any case, please re-run the "Create control
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 17:45:29 -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote:
>>
>> In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then,
>> send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you did
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:45:29 +1000, Michael Havens
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote:
In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then,
send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 8:45:29 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote:
>
> Perhaps I should use another control point detector.
>
That didn't help any!
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote:
>
> In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then,
> send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you did with this
> one.
>
Here is what the clipboard says now:
Searching for
Hi again team
Just thought Id say that if anyone out there was interested in the same
thing I also found this tool and like all good software producers it has a
sweet free trial version and the licence is the cheapest one I have found
http://boxshot.com/vr/
Just let me know if this is the
Dear Michael Havens
On 20.09.2016 13:32, Michael Havens wrote:
> Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even though no control points were
> found.
Then it is of no use. The task at hand is to find out why there are no
control points produced.
Greg assumed that it has something to do with the
Ok, to everyone, thank so much
Sean, you have been awesome at helping me with my email etiquette, thanks.
Zarl, I am looking into that pano2vr its all good, I guess what comes up in
google all depends on their key words matching ones search terms. glad you
showed me that.
Donald, Thanks also,
Can anyone kindly direct me to some software that can be used to create 360
x 360 product rotations that doesnt cost an arm and a leg? Open source is
preferable.
Thanks in advance to all
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You
28 matches
Mail list logo