Thanks T. Modes -- align_image_stack does a great job of finding points but
it appears that align_image_stack only matches pair-wise between sequential
images, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, etc... Those image pairs are aligned very well,
but I have 63 images in this stack so the error compounds too much f
Gerhard, many thanks. I'll give that a try. At the moment I'm using MS
ICE with good results (and have written a viewer to view the result).
Mike
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 4:20 PM, 'Gerhard Rauth' via hugin and other free
panoramic software wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I started with 360° panos after I
Mike,
I started with 360° panos after I had my bought my Mavic pro. Before I
stiched my panos right away in Lightroom. It took my long until I got a
good result in Hugin. (Tested PTGui but I had the same issues with that
app.)
After I changes my workflow I got good results. I take the images n
Thanks for help! I'll try your suggestion out.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this g
FWIW I’ve used Hugin to create night sky panoramas, and I’ve always had to
manually define the control points. One star looks pretty much like another,
and cpfind can’t easily tell them apart. Even after manually setting points
and running one iteration of alignment it still has problems...
S
Am Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018 04:48:44 UTC+2 schrieb clepsydrae:
>
> Excited, I turned to a second stack of star pictures, but for some reason
> I can't figure a way to make cpfind find good control points on them.
>
Maybe align_image_stack is a better choice which this task.
But align_image_st
