Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Mihai Dobrescu
My attempt was with a TIFF image of about 8600 x 2600 px, having around 148 MB. One day, my computer burned. I've asked for a new one to my favorite store and they've said there is a new generation coming, not many having it, and waited for import to be done for a few weeks. Then I've got my i7

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Bob Bright
On 2019-08-08 1:58 a.m., Mihai Dobrescu wrote: This is exactly what I did in the second take, as I have already explained. That took too much to process just to calculate the initial cage, that cage vanished unexpectedly, and was a p

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Mihai Dobrescu
This is exactly what I did in the second take, as I have already explained. That took too much to process just to calculate the initial cage, that cage vanished unexpectedly, and was a pain to adjust, probably due to the big image. Also, not being possible to persist the cage info makes it a bigg

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2019-08-08 10:33 UTC+02:00, Bob Bright : > > What you need to understand about the cage tool is that when you move one of > the points in the cage, the other ones function as anchors to limit the > amount of distortion in their neighbourhood. You don't have to set that many > points, but if you don

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Mihai Dobrescu
Oh, I've forgot to mention that once cage tool is released, you lose the cage... On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 10:02:44 AM UTC+3, Mihai Dobrescu wrote: > > Probably the vanishing of the cage is a bug and after tuning and waiting > it's so frustrating. > Working on a full image is truly difficul

Re: [hugin-ptx] Fit the resulting image as in ACR/PS?

2019-08-08 Thread Mihai Dobrescu
Probably the vanishing of the cage is a bug and after tuning and waiting it's so frustrating. Working on a full image is truly difficult anyway. This is not the right thing to do. I have 24GB of RAM, BTW, so I think is not the memory, but the calculations. Probably GIMP should implement a preview