On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 04:53:41PM -0400, Daniel Md wrote: > Thanks Sean, that looks quite good. I examined the masks and it seems to me > the philosophy you used was to segregate out areas of strong lines (where > discontinuities are easily caught by the eye) to single photos. Is this > correct?
Yes. In a situation like this where there are unavoidable discontinuities, my main goal is to find photos where important / high-detail features are fully visible in a single photo. In this case, the house was fully in one shot and only partly in another, so I exclude-masked the partial shot to make sure that the house will all come from the same photo. In the same vein, I chopped the trees and much of the water channel out of the three lower shots to make sure those elements all came from one shot. Enblend does a good job of hiding the seams in the grass. In some situations, I've taken this technique a step farther by adding the same photo into a pano twice, each with a different set of control points focused on a different area. This can allow the different areas of the image to warp differently, which can't happen with all the control points on a single image. That could potentially help with the pond in the foreground, since it's too big to have fit all into one photo. --Sean -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ZNMzTVEupn8-Seds%40glitch.
