Re: [hugin-ptx] Automatic stitch scans of engineering drawings hopeless?

2019-02-21 Thread jim cullen
he vars to participate in optimization? Thanks again for all the help. jc On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 9:47:04 AM UTC-6, Bruno Postle wrote: > > > > On 19 February 2019 22:59:18 GMT, jim cullen wrote: > > > >I use Equirectangular and Mosaic. I crop to max so I ca

Re: [hugin-ptx] Automatic stitch scans of engineering drawings hopeless?

2019-02-19 Thread jim cullen
ans in that place, or rather that is what I have it set to and I believe that's proper. Many thanks to all who wrote this thing and much thanks to Bruno for aiming me in the right direction. Regards, jc On Friday, February 15, 2019 at 6:12:59 PM UTC-6, Bruno Postle wrote: > > &g

Re: [hugin-ptx] Automatic stitch scans of engineering drawings hopeless?

2019-02-15 Thread jim cullen
Hello Thanks for your suggestion. After slightly modifying the sticth-scan... Python script I have an output.pto I can open in hugin and add control points. I assume need remove points on repeated features as well, optimize and stich. Is that basically correct, and can I delete control points

[hugin-ptx] Automatic stitch scans of engineering drawings hopeless?

2019-02-15 Thread jim cullen
Hello I'm trying to stitch 24 scans into a 2x3 foot drawing using stitch-scanned-images which is a python script on sf gethub.(Running hugin 2018.0.0 macosx) First row alone works well. First 2 of second row fine. Third scan row 2 has a couple of features with very much in common with second