I toyed with this (in Linux, and with the latest SVN). Being me, I tried
to push the envelope and see if it can be used for a large linear
panorama riddled with obstacles, parallax, and all funny things to deal
with.
The good news is that TiX, TiY, TiZ is *very promising*.
The bad news is tha
Hi Oskar,
Oskar Sander schrieb:
> Thanks, I see. So the method was to take one shot as straight down as
> possible and then to take consecutive shots panning out towards the
> horizon perpendicular to the flightpath, and then repeat that procedure
> from the downward view, right?
Looks like i
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 15:54 -0700, Daniel M. German wrote:
>
>did you try optimizing using the tilt model? Tx, Ty and Ts (try those
>before you try Tz).
>I'll be curious to see what happens.
Sorry, I only tried Pablo's modified version.
>Could you post the script so I can try it? Thanks!
I thin
Hi Bruno,
did you try optimizing using the tilt model? Tx, Ty and Ts (try those
before you try Tz).
I'll be curious to see what happens.
Could you post the script so I can try it? Thanks!
--dmg
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 00:37 +0200, Pablo
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 00:37 +0200, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
>
>Quick procedure:
>
>1. panomatic -o 539-549.pto *.jpg
>2. hugin 539-549.pto
> - set focal length to 50mm (~ HFOV 26°)
> - open fast preview
> - set projection to rectilinear,
> - select hfov and vfov ~ 100
> - show only the
Thanks, I see. So the method was to take one shot as straight down as
possible and then to take consecutive shots panning out towards the horizon
perpendicular to the flightpath, and then repeat that procedure from the
downward view, right?
I think the result looks really nice Pablo!
It would be
2009/9/23 Oskar Sander :
> Is it possible to view the source images to this example?
Go to http://78.46.66.234/jpeg1600/ and scroll down to image
DSC00539.jpg Pablo used DSC00539.jpg through to DSC00549.jpg to create
the image above. There are higher resolution versions at
http://78.46.66.234/jpe
Please excuse my noise Pablo.
I just have to ask to clarify in my mind the geometry. Have I understood
correctly that:
* The parameters Tx,Ty,Tz (soon X,Y,Z) are now camera shift (Not attitude
aka "tilt")
* The y,p,r parameters are now changed from the "old" model so they apply to
the camera ce
Pablo d'Angelo schrieb:
> Matt Williams wrote:
>> 2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo :
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the
Tilt parameters and so it really struggled.
>>> Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt
>>>
