I also tried a similar method with GIMP on your photos using other filters
such as unsharp mask with the same substitution idea in mind. Match points
were found, but they tended to be on the upper elements that would introduce
parallax errors when used as match points. It seems to me that for these
Hi Oskar,
did you also try panomatic? It might work better than autopano-sift-c.
ciao
Pablo
Oskar Sander schrieb:
>
>
> My idea is to run CP finding on preprocessed images, and then
> substitute these for the originals before the stich step.
>
> I'd like to understand the APC
>
> My idea is to run CP finding on preprocessed images, and then substitute
> these for the originals before the stich step.
>
> I'd like to understand the APC inner working better though, maybe there are
> potential improvements. I've been peeking a bit in the code of APC and the
> LoweFeature de
I made a workaround with some sucess that I have yet to try on a bigger
scale than on two pictures. Have a look at this project [1].
I pre processed the photos using Adbe lightroom. I made quite radical
adjustments:
Sharpening 91 at radius 1.0
Exposure +0.4 EV
Contrast +100
Doing this
I too am having the same issues. Either under low light conditions or with a
photo or two not in focus. I can match manually, but automatically it won't
match several photos'
I'm using a panohead now for what I do so my panos are very accurate in their
rotation. photo 1 should match photo 2
