On Sat 12-Sep-2009 at 07:38 -0700, RueiKe wrote:
Not sure if I found a bug or if I am doing something wrong. I am
using SVN4352 of 2009.2. I attempted to use the default arguments for
autopano-SIFT-C, and I found that it indicates conversion to a
stereographic projection in the control point
Hi Bruno,
Hugin is able to estimate them from the EXIF data. The values
immediately after loading are Normal (rectilinear), degrees of
view=84.00737, focal length=20, crop factor=1.
Here is text while processing one of the images:
Filename K:\HWD\RL3_8447.tif
rectilinear width 4256
On Mon 14-Sep-2009 at 06:27 -0700, RueiKe wrote:
Hugin is able to estimate them from the EXIF data. The values
immediately after loading are Normal (rectilinear), degrees of
view=84.00737, focal length=20, crop factor=1.
Here is text while processing one of the images:
Filename
Hi Bruno,
Not sure if I found a bug or if I am doing something wrong. I am
using SVN4352 of 2009.2. I attempted to use the default arguments for
autopano-SIFT-C, and I found that it indicates conversion to a
stereographic projection in the control point generation window, even
though an
On 7 sep, 05:26, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
the more the merrier! I would suggest giving more meaningful names
(first column) indicating the purpose of the settings. Some works
better with fisheye lenses than others.
I haven't even checked out this new preset thing (which I deem a very
good
Bart van Andel wrote:
On 7 sep, 05:26, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
the more the merrier! I would suggest giving more meaningful names
(first column) indicating the purpose of the settings. Some works
better with fisheye lenses than others.
I haven't even checked out this new preset thing
On Mon 07-Sep-2009 at 13:00 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
What we absolutely need is a way to identify the different settings, and
this goes via *short* descriptive name.
Long descriptions need support for translation and this effort
should go into creating a properly working patent-free control
Bruno Postle wrote:
On Mon 07-Sep-2009 at 13:00 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
What we absolutely need is a way to identify the different settings, and
this goes via *short* descriptive name.
Long descriptions need support for translation
The long descriptions are not my point.
My point is that
On Mon 07-Sep-2009 at 17:48 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
My point is that there can be multiple settings for the same tool and
that currently the short description allows one to have the same short
name more than once. This affects also the potential patent-free cp
generator.
I don't think there is
Bruno Postle wrote:
I don't think there is any need to ship with alternative
incantations for each tool,
it's not about shipping with alternatives. It is about making sure
that the name given to a further incantation added by the user is unique
(i.e. check that it is not an already existing
After working with both autopoint-sift-c and matchpoint, i'm finding that
panomatic is finding the best points.
Dale
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 23:17:42 +0100
From: br...@postle.net
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Control point generator incantations
Hugin-2009.2.0 has
Bruno Postle wrote:
Hugin-2009.2.0 has the ability to configure multiple control point
generators. Currently the default and only control point generator
setup is:
Autopano-SIFT-C, autopano-sift-c, --maxmatches %p %o %i
Though actually you should get better results with these extra
12 matches
Mail list logo
