[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI temp folder and best performance?

2013-07-23 Thread T. Modes
Am Samstag, 20. Juli 2013 21:01:03 UTC+2 schrieb Jan Martin: > > > Performance: > I am using --parallel with as many .pto files as there are cores. > Each .pto files is ony 6 files with 5 MB each. But a real lot of .pto > files. > > Is that the right setting for best performance? > > The single

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI temp folder and best performance?

2013-07-23 Thread Jan Martin
Hi Thomas, you nailed it. I have - 64 bit Windows, - lots of RAM, - fast SSD. Running as many batches in parallel as there are cores is the most permanent setup I found. I just posted a bounty today for a command-line option to "shut down PTBatcherGUI when done" at this list. An option for the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI temp folder and best performance?

2013-07-23 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2013/7/23 Jan Martin > Hi Thomas, > > you nailed it. > > I have > - 64 bit Windows, > - lots of RAM, > - fast SSD. > > Running as many batches in parallel as there are cores is the most > permanent setup I found. > > I just posted a bounty today for a command-line option to "shut down > PTBatcher