[hugin-ptx] Re: Region of Interest (ROI) for Control Point Finding/Image Alignment?

2011-02-15 Thread kfj
On 15 Feb., 04:36, Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de wrote: Am 13.02.2011 16:25, schrieb kfj: I am currently toying with this mechanism for use in another demo plugin, but I want to throw in rewarping of the parts of the images that correspond to the ROIs to a common projection to make

[hugin-ptx] Re: Region of Interest (ROI) for Control Point Finding/Image Alignment?

2011-02-14 Thread Jeffrey Martin
Hmm yes. Honoring a mask/alpha channel seems a very reasonable way to make this work. On Sunday, February 13, 2011 4:25:22 PM UTC+1, kfj wrote: It seems wasteful, but you also have to consider the time you have to invest to pre-position the images roughly so the ROI can be detected as

[hugin-ptx] Re: Region of Interest (ROI) for Control Point Finding/Image Alignment?

2011-02-14 Thread Pablo d'Angelo
Am 13.02.2011 16:25, schrieb kfj: On 13 Feb., 11:13, Jeffrey Martin360cit...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking also... for panos, the centers of images usually do not overlap. isn't searching the WHOLE of images a big waste? There is another aspect which becomes more important with fisheyes

[hugin-ptx] Re: Region of Interest (ROI) for Control Point Finding/Image Alignment?

2011-02-13 Thread kfj
On 13 Feb., 11:13, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking also... for panos, the centers of images usually do not overlap. isn't searching the WHOLE of images a big waste? It seems wasteful, but you also have to consider the time you have to invest to pre-position the