My personal experience with ...Intel 945 board has compatibility issues
with Hugin. But It was in windows only . I have checked it under ubuntu and
same vga works perfectly.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:55 PM, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Okt., 16:24, Dale Beams wrote:
> > KFJ,
> >
On 19 Okt., 16:24, Dale Beams wrote:
> KFJ,
>
> Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't
> have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't
> have the right drivers for you video card.
I have chipset graphics. intel 945 GM, if I'm not mistaken.
KFJ,
Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't
have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't
have the right drivers for you video card.
Dale
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 03:37 -0700, kfj wrote:
>
> On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright wrote:
> > There wer
On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright wrote:
> There were a couple of dependencies missing from the panoglview
> instructions on the wiki (libwxgtk2.8-dev and libglew-dev). I've added
> them, so you might want to try again.
I had those already. It compiles fine, I just don't get it to run,
neither wha
There were a couple of dependencies missing from the panoglview
instructions on the wiki (libwxgtk2.8-dev and libglew-dev). I've added
them, so you might want to try again.
Cheers,
BBB
--
Bob Bright
Vancouver Island Digital Imaging
http://VictoriaVR.ca
On 10-10-17 02:20 AM, kfj wrote:
[see
On 17 Okt., 14:55, Yuval Levy wrote:
> sorry to read this. No, the error message does not look familiar to me. It
> seems to be a runtime error. Have you tried with a jpeg image? or a tiff with
> different compression? I have not tried panoglview in more than two years...
>
the error is wha
On October 17, 2010 05:25:55 am kfj wrote:
> oops... maybe I've been barking up the wrong tree all along. Sorry for
> all the noise I created because of my naively following the wiki and
> installing Dale's packets. I'll start afresh.
don't worry. as the Italian say goes: "can che abbaia non mor
On 17 Okt., 13:21, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
> spherical 360X180 panorama.
I used the 'sherical' setting for my image, since it's a spherical
panorama, after all. Using the equirectangular setting, it displays
correctly
On 17 Okt., 04:11, Yuval Levy wrote:
> For viewing the panos (and more), I highly recommend Panini. I've added the
> instruction on the wiki page [0]
>
> Yuv
Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
spherical 360X180 panorama. And it's a bit rough, with all the d
On 17 Okt., 12:16, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.
still no joy with panoglview. Does this look familiar to anyone:
k...@anja:~/src/panoglview/pglv.hg$ panoglview ~/Bilder/*4/*_fused.tif
The program 'panoglview' received an X
On 17 Okt., 04:01, Yuval Levy wrote:
> You are free to do what you want on your website and with your resources.
> Lemmings are free to follow each other to the abyss. For those not wanting to
> build to use new features there are better options. They are now documented
> on the wiki page as
On 17 Okt., 00:56, Yuval Levy wrote:
> @Dale: I find your activity to be spurious, random, conducive to confusion at
> best, and to damage otherwise. Whether it is about build instructions or the
> distribution of deb packages. Would you please stop and validate with more
> experienced contr
On 16 Okt., 21:58, Dale Beams wrote:
> I've had an exhausting week, and have decided to rest before i collapse. I
> do know that hugin will build. Make sure > you have gettext and look through
> the list of wx stuff ... "sudo aptitude search wx"
Hi Dale!
Please don't stress yourself because
On October 16, 2010 09:39:13 am kfj wrote:
> I had to use
> KPackageKit to install a few packets, since I did not manage to do it
> all by just apt-get.
what exactly went wrong for you with apt-get? and how was KPackageKit better?
> When I tried to build hugin, I got precisely the same error as
hi KJF,
On October 16, 2010 02:55:31 pm kfj wrote:
> I can't get rid of the feeling that something has changed in
> wxWidgets.
can't confirm.
> don't have anything on Kubuntu 10.10 to look at the panoramas now -
> all the viewers I tried won't compile either. I might have to run
> FSPViewer in
For those not wanting to
build to use new features there are better options. They are now documented
on the wiki page as well. I recommend the deb packages by Philipp Seidel -
they have been built according to the canonical way of building packages.
Yuv
[0]
<http://wiki.panotools.org/wi
d to use new features. This is OSS, and that's what
freedom is about. Isn't it great!
Dale
> From: goo...@levy.ch
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:56:44 -0400
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> On
Hi Bob,
On October 16, 2010 06:10:22 pm Bob Bright wrote:
> Dale: It doesn't matter whether you use aptitude or apt-get -- there's
> no such package as 'wx-i18n'. And as kfj has already noted, installing
> wx2.8-i18n doesn't help with the build.
>
> The missing dependency is in fact libwxgtk2.8-
aptitude install some_package" as it's a more
complete solution and will pick items that apt-get doesn't. As a
result I've only been adding those dependencies which have shown
deficient in aptitude.
Dale
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-p
rest before i collapse. I do
know that hugin will build. Make sure you have gettext and look through the
list of wx stuff ... "sudo aptitude search wx"
Dale
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:55:31 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> From: _...@yahoo.com
> To:
Thanks for the advice. I couldn't help pottering with the sources, and
I can't get rid of the feeling that something has changed in
wxWidgets. I haven't managed to figure it out, but all the other
builds that fail seem to also be stuck somewhere in the wx code.
I'm using your 2010.3.0 build, so far
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 06:39 -0700, kfj wrote:
> On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams wrote:
> > Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
> ...
> > I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
> > and installation. My build and installations are clean. Then I'l
On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams wrote:
> Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
...
> I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
> and installation. My build and installations are clean. Then I'll
...
Hi Dale!
I tried to step in your footsteps and st
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 23:42 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > sudo dpkg -D -i some_package_name.deb
>
> drbe...@ubuntu:~/src/enblend/enblend.build$ sudo dpkg -D -i
> enblend-4.1.1-Linux.deb
> D10: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 23:42 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> sudo dpkg -D -i some_package_name.deb
drbe...@ubuntu:~/src/enblend/enblend.build$ sudo dpkg -D -i
enblend-4.1.1-Linux.deb
D10: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci'
Selecting previously deselected package enblend.
(
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
> Kornel,
>
> On a clean system, after the *.deb is built, when attemtping to install
> using the command
>
> "sudo dpkg -i some_package_name.deb"
>
> the package fails to install because it's unable to create the necessary
> directories. I've assu
Kornel,
On a clean system, after the *.deb is built, when attemtping to install
using the command
"sudo dpkg -i some_package_name.deb"
the package fails to install because it's unable to create the necessary
directories. I've assumed this is a permissions problem. I assume the
binary package (
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
> Kornel,
>
> I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
> and installation. My build and installations are clean. Then I'll
> normally install on my own system and post the binaries.
>
> I posted early before doing c
ponse to others who were trying to build.
I was able to get a successful build, following through the wiki.
Dale
From: kornel.be...@berlin.de
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:04:36 +0200
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 sc
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
> btw, thanks for the directories list. I hadn't gotten all the way through
> it yet before I had to part to do something else.
>
> Dale
Googling i found following:
...
> INSTALL(FILES my_project.glade DESTINATION /usr/share/my_pro
On 15 Okt., 18:39, Dale Beams wrote:
> Have you tried building using aptitude. Ubuntu's prefered way is first the
> software manager and then if needed aptitude. Therefore I always use "sudo
> aptitude install some_package" as it's a more complete solution and will pick
> items that apt-get
_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/Debian/postinst")
before the statement
INCLUDE(CPack)
There should be a better way of course. I really don't understand why this
directories are not created with
packages built on this system.
Kornel
> Dale
>
> > Date: Fri, 15 O
btw, thanks for the directories list. I hadn't gotten all the way through it
yet before I had to part to do something else.
Dale
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> From: _...@yahoo.com
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
&g
ult I've only been adding those
dependencies which have shown deficient in aptitude.
Dale
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> From: _...@yahoo.com
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
>
> On 15 Okt., 15:50, Dale Beams w
On 15 Okt., 15:50, Dale Beams wrote:
> Specifically you need libwxbase2.8-dev and wx-i18n
>
I have libwxbase2.8-dev installed and also wx2.8-i18n
The wiki is wrong insofar as there is no 'wx-i18n' to be got by apt-
get since it is a virtual packet which is made available by
wx2.8-i18n 2.8.11.0-0
Specifically you need libwxbase2.8-dev and wx-i18n
Dale
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:42:48 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> From: _...@yahoo.com
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
>
> Hi!
> I'm stuck in the same place
>
> > 63%] Building
installing to a new system.
Dale
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:42:48 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
> From: _...@yahoo.com
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
>
> Hi!
> I'm stuck in the same place
>
> > 63%] Building CXX object
> > s
Hi!
I'm stuck in the same place
> 63%] Building CXX object
> src/hugin1/base_wx/CMakeFiles/huginbasewx.dir/ImageCache.cpp.o
> ...
saw Dale's post
On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams wrote:
> Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
... so I tried to apt-get the package
k...@anja:~$
38 matches
Mail list logo
