Yuval Levy wrote:
[...]
> while we are at it, the Debian packages drops a couple of other dependencies.
>
> Should we drop them too? see attached patch.
[...]
In the long run it is probably not worth forking this cmake test from
GLUT.
cu andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Matu
Am Sonntag, 28. November 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> On November 27, 2010 07:14:00 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I propose to drop the /usr/lib/libGL.so.1-dependency.
>
> is there any disadvantage doing so?
>
> while we are at it, the Debian packages drops a couple of other
> dependencies. Should we
On November 28, 2010 06:30:48 pm Yuval Levy wrote:
> An Ubuntu binary package of Hugin is available for Lucid (10.4) in my PPA
> [0]. If somebody can verify it is correct, I'll transfer it to the
> official Hugin PPA.
>
> I'll look into a Jaunty (9.10) version after dinner.
got my alphabet wrong,
> I'll look into a Jaunty (9.10) version after dinner.
" hey lady if you don't know what "diddy wah diddy" [0]means , don't mess
with it"
> [0] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYaWTCY0Tns
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free pano
On November 27, 2010 11:37:09 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Yuval Levy wrote:
> > On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimental tomorrow.
> >> Works-for-me packaging is already in git
> >> git://git.debian.org/git
On November 27, 2010 07:14:00 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> I propose to drop the /usr/lib/libGL.so.1-dependency.
is there any disadvantage doing so?
while we are at it, the Debian packages drops a couple of other dependencies.
Should we drop them too? see attached patch.
> I even don't understand
Yuval Levy wrote:
> On November 27, 2010 01:46:36 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>> > Yuval Levy wrote:
>> > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
>> > > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
>> >
>> > I am not sure but this might be caused
Am Sonntag, 28. November 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> On November 27, 2010 06:30:20 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > I wonder if there is a relationship to this bug
> > >
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/679427
> >
> > I don't think so. In this case hugin crashes, while in our case there is
On November 27, 2010 06:30:20 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I wonder if there is a relationship to this bug
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/679427
>
> I don't think so. In this case hugin crashes, while in our case there is
> only incorrect setting in cmake. This does not break the com
Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
...
> > Since loading of shared libraries is configured with
> > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf, I checked the files there. I found a file
> >
> > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/GL.conf
> >
> > which lists the needed directories here
> >
> > # cat /etc
On November 27, 2010 05:12:19 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
> ...
>
> > > Looks like the last upgrade (in ubuntu 10.10) for nvidia made a change
> > > from
> > >
> > > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > /usr/lib/nvidia-173/libGL.so.1
Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
...
> >
> > Looks like the last upgrade (in ubuntu 10.10) for nvidia made a change
> > from
> >
> > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> >
> > to
> >
> > /usr/lib/nvidia-173/libGL.so.1
> >
> > but our cmake does not find the correct lib. On my system
On November 27, 2010 01:46:36 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> > Yuval Levy wrote:
> > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
> > > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> >
> > I am not sure but this might be caused by building on a system
> >
Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> Yuval Levy wrote:
> > On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimental tomorrow.
> >> Works-for-me packaging is already in git
> >> git://git.debian.org/git/
Yuval Levy wrote:
> On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimental tomorrow.
>> Works-for-me packaging is already in git
>> git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-phototools/hugin.git but I wanted to push
>> some minor changes in
Please don't delete autopano-noop, as this will break existing working
configurations for no good reason.
Ideally Hugin would do a check on startup, and if it finds that autopano-noop
is the default it would silently change the preferences to cpfind. If we do
this then autopano-noop can go.
--
On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Also it might be nice to keep autopano-noop around a little bit longer
ok, so this change won't go into 2010.4, but it will go into default and will
eventually be part of 2011.0
> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimen
Yuval Levy wrote:
> now that we have cpfind, do we really need to install the
> autopano-noop thing?
> I don't think so.
> Unless I'm told I am wrong, I will send to oblivion in the depth of the repo
> the following files:
> ./utils/autopano-noop.sh
> ./utils/CMakeLists.txt
[...]
Hello,
Autop
Hi Yuv,
On 27 Nov., 15:53, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Unless I'm told I am wrong, I will send to oblivion in the depth of the repo
> the following files:
> ./utils/autopano-noop.sh
> ./utils/CMakeLists.txt
You need then also to clean up the main CMakeLists.txt (line 504).
> * there is also an old wind
19 matches
Mail list logo
