I'm no expert on enfuse, but 16 bit images do not contain the same
amount of information as two 8-bit images. There's at most about 10
bits (stops) of real information in that 16 bit file, see also
http://theory.uchicago.edu/~ejm/pix/20d/tests/noise/index.html. If you
are talking about 6 8-bit images created out of the same 3 16-bit
images that does sound unexpected (again, knowing very little about
enfuse), but if this is 6 exposures vs 3 I'm not surprised.

On Apr 3, 12:45 am, Benjamin Schnieders
<benjamin.schnied...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i read about the basics of enfuse and how it works, from what is written
> on the website i expected the same result for, say, 3 16 bit images
> fused together as for 6 8 bit images. however, from my subjective point
> of view, the 6-picture approach gives better results. (how come? i
> thought using weights for all layers should be able to produce the same
> results..?)
>
> i'm shooting raw images with a canon 450d, then batch converting them
> all with ufraw to 16bit - to extract more 8-bit-exposures i'd have to
> use at least some scripts that find out in which order my bracketed
> shots are etc, so i'd prefer to use directly the 16 bit files.
>
> besides that, what exposures should i use for an 8-bit approach? my
> first idea was (from the series [-2, 0, +2]EV) to extract -2, -1.5 from
> the first shot, -0.5, 0, 0.5 from the middle and 1.5, 2.0 from the third
> - rather than using whole 1-EV increments, as then information from the
> middle image might struggle with the outer images ;)
>
> thx,
> Benjamin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to