Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-02-07 Thread Terry Duell
Hullo Bart, On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:05:44 +1100, Bart van Andel wrote: Hey everybody, I've downloaded the source files to try and see if I could compile it for my own purposes. Attached is a modified version (source code) with a number of changes compared to David's current version: [s

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-02-07 Thread Bart van Andel
Oh, by the way, when installing mingw-cross-env, it is not required to build the whole system (which takes ages). After unpacking the .tar.gz archive or "hg clone"ing the system, a mere "make tiff jpeg" should do. This will automatically build the dependencies required for libtiff and libjpeg (

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-02-07 Thread Bart van Andel
Hey everybody, I've downloaded the source files to try and see if I could compile it for my own purposes. Attached is a modified version (source code) with a number of changes compared to David's current version: - The software can now be cross-compiled on a Linux system targeting Win32,

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-02-03 Thread Monkey
Just to keep you all up to date, I've got what I think is a workable idea to implement wrapping. It will increase execution time, but not much, and may also use slightly more memory, but it'll be worth the sacrifice :) I'm not sure when I'll get around to programming it yet, but it will be done. I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-23 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2012/1/23 Bart van Andel > Although this is slightly off topic, I feel I should mention it. > > On Monday, January 16, 2012 6:05:15 PM UTC+1, Monkey wrote: > >> I've updated the download archive now - I haven't changed the version >> number as the fix doesn't change multiblend's functionality. >>

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-23 Thread Bart van Andel
Although this is slightly off topic, I feel I should mention it. On Monday, January 16, 2012 6:05:15 PM UTC+1, Monkey wrote: > I've updated the download archive now - I haven't changed the version > number as the fix doesn't change multiblend's functionality. > Please do update version numbers

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-17 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Again: check the several mails about hugin for OSX. Search for "[OSX] 20120115 New Hugin bundle hugin-mac-​2011.5.0.5​723_cd2f5e​37af3b incl. multiblend 0.2 and enblend 4.1 developmen​t" Harry 2012/1/17 Naked Robot <360cit...@gmail.com> > does anyone have a compiled version for mac available? >

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-17 Thread Naked Robot
does anyone have a compiled version for mac available? Thank you, Naked Robot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-16 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
Thanks David! Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) http://cartola.org/360 2012/1/16 Monkey > Hi Carlos, > > I've updated the download archive now - I haven't changed the version > number as the fix doesn't change multiblend's functionality. > > David > > On Jan 14, 10:03 am, "Carlos Eduardo G. Carva

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-16 Thread Monkey
Hi Carlos, I've updated the download archive now - I haven't changed the version number as the fix doesn't change multiblend's functionality. David On Jan 14, 10:03 am, "Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)" wrote: > Hi David, will you update the version as Harry asked? Today I downloaded > fro

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-14 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
Hi David, will you update the version as Harry asked? Today I downloaded from your site for another machine and had to download the last file separately from the link here. Thanks! Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) http://cartola.org/360 2012/1/9 Harry van der Wolf > > > 2012/1/9 Monkey > >> Hm

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-09 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2012/1/9 Monkey > Hmm... there are other int/float dual use bits that apparently need > rewriting. I just did the minimum to get it working on Fedora. > > Give this a try, if you could: > > http://horman.net/multiblend/blending-int.cpp > > Harry, where do your universal builds segfault? After "ma

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-09 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
It looks ok now David! Worked with -O, -O2 and -O3. The best execution time was with -O2 where I got 35.48s. The other two ran around 37s. Thanks, Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) http://cartola.org/360 2012/1/9 Monkey > Hmm... there are other int/float dual use bits that apparently need > rewr

[hugin-ptx] Re: multiblend - a faster alternative to Enblend (Win x86/x64 binaries and source code) - v0.2 with JPEG support + bugfixes

2012-01-09 Thread Monkey
Hmm... there are other int/float dual use bits that apparently need rewriting. I just did the minimum to get it working on Fedora. Give this a try, if you could: http://horman.net/multiblend/blending-int.cpp Harry, where do your universal builds segfault? After "masks..." or "blending..." ? Dav