Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 20:33:42 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote: > On 23.09.2016 01:40, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> No, icpfind starts the control point detector. In my case it was >> looking for panomatic, in Michael's case cpfind. > > Thank you for the details, I was not aware of this

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

Hi Greg I feel that we have two different issues, the first one with the missing PATH environment when setting the temporary directory, the second one with the "out of space" message. Let's concentrate on the former here, as both you and Michael seem to experience this. On 23.09.2016 01:40, Greg

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 17:49:59 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote: > Hi Greg > > On 22.09.2016 03:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 21:00:56 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote: >>> On 20.09.2016 13:32, Michael Havens wrote: Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:56:23 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:50:10 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> I did specify 'ls -l'. If you look at those files, I think you'll >> find they're in the order of 10 kB each. > > $ ls -l /home/bmike1/hugintmp >

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

I cancelled my large stitcch and stitched something small together. this is before I started the stitch: > bmike1@MikesBeast ~/hugintmp $ ls -l /tmp >> total 16 >> srwxr-xr-x 1 bmike1 bmike10 Sep 21 15:15 gedit.bmike1.2619256144 >> drwx-- 2 bmike1 bmike1 4096 Sep 21 17:04

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:50:10 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > I did specify 'ls -l'. If you look at those files, I think you'll > find they're in the order of 10 kB each. > $ ls -l /home/bmike1/hugintmp total 100 -rw--- 1 bmike1 bmike1 419 Sep 20 17:59 hec1QPQW -rw---

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:39:13 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > I didn't do your ls command because it is stitching in the hugintmp > directory right now. > >> /hugintmp $ ls /home/bmike1/hugintmp > hec1QPQW heFan8Hr heL3W456 huginpto_0vYcMe huginpto_95itzG > huginpto_UEq4Vb >

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

I didn't do your ls command because it is stitching in the hugintmp directory right now. ~/hugintmp $ ls /home/bmike1/hugintmp hec1QPQW heFan8Hr heL3W456 huginpto_0vYcMe huginpto_95itzG huginpto_UEq4Vb hee6TKlX hehyqyzB heMNMrcf huginpto_2c8gZv huginpto_HYTJTG huginpto_ZuLc6q -- A

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:22:48 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > > Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching. > > Where? Take a look in your specified directory and see what's in > there. > In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in "/home/bmike1/hugintmp" In

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

[sequence recovered] On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:09:15 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> Good idea, but so far we have no evidence that anything is being >> written to /tmp or wherever. That's what I've been trying

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

I don't know where the intermediate files are saved whether it is /tmp or elsewhere. When I was working on this issue 6 months ago someone said it was /tmp so I just went with that. Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching. On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4,

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

I don't know where the intermediate files are saved whether it is /tmp or elsewhere. When I was working on this issue 6 months ago someone said it was /tmp so I just went with that. Tduell's suggestion worked. It is now stitching. On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:43:00 PM UTC-4,

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 21:00:56 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote: > On 20.09.2016 13:32, Michael Havens wrote: >> Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even though no control points were >> found. > > Then it is of no use. The task at hand is to find out why there are no > control points

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 10:57:57 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:45:29 +1000, Michael Havens > wrote: >> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: >>> >>> In any case, please re-run the "Create control

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 17:45:29 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: >> >> In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then, >> send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you did

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:45:29 +1000, Michael Havens wrote: On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then, send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 8:45:29 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > Perhaps I should use another control point detector. > That didn't help any! -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:02:05 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: > > In any case, please re-run the "Create control points" action and then, > send us the resulting log file from you clipboard as you did with this > one. > Here is what the clipboard says now: Searching for

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

Dear Michael Havens On 20.09.2016 13:32, Michael Havens wrote: > Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even though no control points were > found. Then it is of no use. The task at hand is to find out why there are no control points produced. Greg assumed that it has something to do with the

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

here is what is in my clipboard: " " . hmmm nothing new was saved to the clipboard! On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:32:44 AM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > Okay, I'm running the stitcher now even though no control points were > found. > I found the "Copy log messages

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 20:16:31 -1000, David W. Jones wrote: > On 09/17/2016 04:28 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 18:33:46 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: I was expecting

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On 09/17/2016 04:28 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 18:33:46 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: I was expecting an answer on my question as to where the files were being written, based on the logs.

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 18:33:46 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> I was expecting an answer on my question as to where the files were >> being written, based on the logs. > > I am so sorry but I can't answer that. I

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > I was > expecting an answer on my question as to where the files were being > written, based on the logs. > > I am so sorry but I can't answer that. I don't know where hugin stores the logs if their not in /var/log .

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

or: $ df /tmp -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb123G 15G 7.4G 66% / On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 1:54:06 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > or : > > /tmp $ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > udev3.8G 4.0K 3.8G

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

or : /tmp $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev3.8G 4.0K 3.8G 1% /dev tmpfs 786M 1.5M 785M 1% /run /dev/sdb123G 15G 7.4G 66% / none4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 9:00:17 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > > You still haven't answered my question about the running out of disk > space. We haven't been able to reproduce that. > Sorry I missed that question. Don't worry so much about that. It is unlikely you will be able

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, 16 September 2016 at 16:51:37 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > Yipeee! (I guess) I found a bug. oh joy! I Indeed. Most people aren't so happy when they run into bugs :-) > am so glad I don't run out of disk space from stitching a couple of > images together because I need to be

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

Yipeee! (I guess) I found a bug. oh joy! I am so glad I don't run out of disk space from stitching a couple of images together because I need to be able to stitc a few images together to simulate a wide angle lens. Did ypou take care of reporting the issue Or do you want me to do it? On

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, 16 September 2016 at 3:36:56 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 3:42:08 AM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> 1. You followed my advice and set the temporary directory path in >> preferences/file names. > > Yes sir I did. Unfortunately it was bad advice,

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, 16 September 2016 at 3:36:56 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 3:42:08 AM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> 1. You followed my advice and set the temporary directory path in >> preferences/file names. >> > > Yes sir I did. ... I'll address this and the

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 10:46:29 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > > Not without seeing the images. Where are they? Did you take them at > constant exposure settings? > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1NXBsN1VzV1B1R2s > Which version of Hugin is this? And what's the

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 3:42:08 AM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > 1. You followed my advice and set the temporary directory path in > preferences/file names. > Yes sir I did. > 2. The "temporary directory path" is really a search path for > executables. > It is

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, 16 September 2016 at 12:46:25 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 19:28:54 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: >> > >> ASSERT INFO: >> /usr/include/wx-3.0/wx/strvararg.h(451): assert "(argtype & >> (wxFormatStringSpecifier::value)) == argtype" failed in >>

Re: [hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 19:28:54 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > > I got 34 images and when I first load the images everything seems > cool but when I click align I get an error . Then I click > continue and it says that none of my images have control points and > that I need to put them

[hugin-ptx] first attempt at a spherical pano

or at least of a dome pano (half sphere). I got 34 images and when I first load the images everything seems cool but when I click align I get an error . Then I click continue and it says that none of my images have control points and that I need to put them in manually. Any ideas as to what's