Alfredo Paz-Valderrama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but whe the Thompson's book says:
Literals are not overloaded,
Here is what the Haskell 98 report says, in chapter 3 on page 18:
An integer literal represents th
Alfredo Paz-Valderrama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is confused by / in Haskell.
1 / 2
I get 0.5 by answer, but the / operator signature is:
float -> float -> float
No, it certainly is NOT that. At the Hugs prompt, type
:type (/)
and you will see the
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2005 06:04 schrieb Alfredo Paz-Valderrama:
> Ok
> but whe the Thompson's book says:
>
>
> Literals are not overloaded, there is no automatic conversion from Int to
> Float. .. we will receive an error message if we type
>
> (floor
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:04:14PM -0500, Alfredo Paz-Valderrama wrote:
> but whe the Thompson's book says:
>
>
> Literals are not overloaded, there is no automatic conversion from Int to
> Float.
^^^
My copy says (on p45) "Al
