To Get Away With Murder, Chhattisgarh Style

By Javed Iqbal

23 February, 2010
Moonchasing.wordpress.com

Sets: The Supreme Court and the inaccessible jungles of Dantewada.

Cast – missing witnesses and supreme court petitioners, a
controversial activist, a young superintendent of police, counsel for
the petitioners Colin Gonsales, counsel for the respondents Ajit Jha
and DGP Chhattisgarh Vishwaranjan.

Plot – the truth about the killing of nine villagers at the onset of
Operation Green Hunt.

Act I – It was alleged that, in the early morning of the 1st of
October, 2009, a police party killed nine innocent adivasis at the
village of Gompad, Dantewada district, Chhattisgarh.

There were no press reports about it, no press conferences and no
bodies were taken to the police station. There were numerous
conflicting accounts of whether it was ever announced by the police.

Testimonies of the villagers: The Maoists were present outside the
village in the morning but they had disappeared long before the
security forces arrived. All those who were killed were villagers of
Gompad and two were from Bandarpadar. Three of them were women, one of
them was an eight year old girl, and an eighteen month old baby Katam
Suresh lost three of his fingers. His deceased mother was missing her
nose and her body was found before the remnants of her burnt home. Two
other deceased villagers – Soyam Subbaiya (20) and Soyam Jogi (18)
were a newly married couple.

One more villager was killed from the neighbouring village of
Nukaltong and another from Velpocha on the same day.

Act II – Activist Himanshu Kumar takes the victims of violence of
Gompad, Velpocha, Nukaltong and the village of Gacchanpalli where five
villagers were killed on the 17th of September, 2009 to the Supreme
Court and files a Writ Petition (criminal) No.103 of 2009, against the
State of Chhattisgarh, Respondent no.1.

The Supreme Court accepts the petition and requests the State of
Chhattisgarh to file a reply.

Act III – Activist Himanshu Kumar is hounded out of Chhattisgarh, his
right-hand man Kopa Kunjam is imprisoned and petitioner no.13 Sodhi
Sambo who was in the care of Mr. Kumar is detained at Kanker police
station on her way to receive treatment for her injured leg. She will
be kept in virtual confinement at Jagdalpur’s Maharani Hospital with
no access to her lawyer, activists or the press.

The Supreme Court passes an order directing that the Respondents would
in no way obstruct Sodhi Sambo from going wherever she pleases. So
instead of letting her go wherever she pleases (which no one could ask
her about as she had no access to anyone), the respondents take her to
Delhi, AIIMS hospital themselves and she is again, not allowed access
to her lawyer, activists or the press.

At the same time, villagers who had come for a public hearing at
Dantewada (organized by Himanshu Kumar) on the 5th of January, 2010
were last seen being driven away by the police in four Bolero vehicles
without license plates.

Katam Suresh of Gompad who is now around two years old, and his father
Katam Dulaiah, along with Soyam Rama and Soyam Dhulla from Gompad were
taken away and were last seen at Konta Police Station on the 14th of
January, 2009.

Colin Gonsales, advocate for the petitioners, on the 10th of January:
`Apparently all the 12 tribal petitioners from the writ petition have
been picked up and are in custody of the police, and it is possible
that they will be coerced to withdraw from the case.’

On the 22nd of January, Justice Sudarshan Reddy and S.S. Nijjar,
presiding judges of the Supreme Court passed an order allowing lawyer
Colin Gonsales and activist Himanshu Kumar access to Sodhi Sambo at
AIIMS, stating, “we direct that the respondents shall not create any
obstacle in the way of petitioner No.1 and/or advocate for the
petitioners in meeting petitioner No.13, in which the police shall not
be present.”

However it soon came to light that Sodhi Sambo was discharged from
AIIMS. Counsel of State of Chhattisgarh Ajit Jha had previously told
the court that the Chhattisgarh State had no objection to anyone
meeting her and that she was still in AIIMS.

Act IV – On the 23rd of January, the police exhume the bodies of the
villagers of Gompad while the lawyers claim they’re tampering with
evidence.

On visiting Gompad, it has been observed that articles of clothing
have been removed from the graves. A bottle of phenyl as well as the
packaging of surgical gloves lie around the graves.

Act V – The Supreme Court directs the State of Chhattisgarh to produce
all the petitioners by Monday the 15th of February, 2010. The State
claims all of them have gone back to their villagers, the lawyer for
the petitioners claim all of them are still in custody of the police.
No independent verification is possible.

On the 9th of February, a police party attempts to go to the village
of Gacchanpalli to bring the petitioners to court and are allegedly
ambushed by Maoists around the village of Gorkha.

No local journalists visit the spot yet two SPOs are reported to be
seriously injured.

On the 15th of February, the police present the petitioners of the
village of Gompad – Sodhi Sambo along with Soyam Rama and Soyam Dhulla
to the Supreme Court. They also presented petitioners Muchaki Sukdi
from the neighbouring village of Nukaltong and Kunjam Idma from the
village of Velpocha.

They were always in the custody of the police, and the police claimed
they did this to protect them from Maoists who might consider them to
be police informants.

Act VI – On the 15th and 16th of February, six of the petitioners (of
all the villages but Gacchanpalli) confirm that killings took place
but they don’t know who attacked their villages on the said day.

As of February 18th, all the villagers still living at Gompad and the
villagers of Velpocha claim that it was the police who had attacked
them on that day. They had come at six in the morning at Gompad, burnt
two houses and killed nine people. They had killed one young boy
Kunjam Hoora from Velpocha and another Muchaki Bhoote from Nukaltong a
while later.

According to press reports from the South Asia Terrorism Portal
regarding the 1st of October, the police claimed to have killed two
Maoists around the Nukaltong forested area, and detained nine
villagers for `interrogation.’

DGP Vishwaranjan writes in the Outlook: “The police have since August
2009 been receiving credible intelligence about Maoist designs to
oppose Operation Green Hunt by killing tribals or committing other
atrocities and then blaming the security forces.”

Two houses were burnt down in the village of Gompad.

Act VII – On the 18th of February, Sodhi Sambo’s parents claim they
met their daughter at Jagdalpur three `saptaahs’ ago (three market
days ago, which is three weeks). Superintendent of Police Amresh
Mishra had initially claimed that Sodhi Sambo’s parents were her
attendants at Jagdalpur hospital in the first week of January. That
was six `saptaahs’ ago. The next of kin of both Kunjam Idma and of
Soyam Rama and Soyam Dhulla, claim that their relatives never made it
home after a meeting in Dantewada more than two months ago – the date
of the botched public hearing on the 5th of January.

Kattam Dullaiah and his 2 year old son Suresh from Gompad, who are NOT
petitioners are still missing.

Act VIII – Similarly, a few days after the alleged `ambush’ at Gorkha,
villagers from Gacchanpalli begin to appear at the markets in Andhra
Pradesh and claim that the police had come to their village and taken
away 20 people.

http://www.countercurrents.org/iqbal230210.htm



-- 


You cannot build anything on the foundations of caste. You cannot
build up a nation, you cannot build up a morality. Anything that you
will build on the foundations of caste will crack and will never be a
whole.
-AMBEDKAR



http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movem...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to