- "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
> Thanks for your patience! Samuel just committed a
> bunch more -- try the next one:
That fixed up the PGI warnings, but I'm still seeing
a heap with the Intel compilers. Output attached again.
[csamuel@tango hwloc-0.9.1rc4r1282]$ icc -V
Intel(R) C Intel(R) 64 C
Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit :
> I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers.
Yes, these are mostly pedantism warnings which we do not need to fix for
this release (would need tagging parameters as unused etc.)
Samuel
K. Clear for a final rc / release?
(due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an
rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning)
On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit :
> I'm still s
I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume
everything is ok now.
Brice
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> K. Clear for a final rc / release?
>
> (due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an
> rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning)
>
Please beat it up and look for problems!
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v0.9/
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
Brice Goglin, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 22:03:11 +0100, a écrit :
> I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume
> everything is ok now.
Same for me.
Samuel
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
> K. Clear for a final rc / release?
Go for it, am just about to go run a training course
now so won't be available until this arvo Melbourne
time..
cheers!
Chris
--
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Comp
- "Chris Samuel" wrote:
> - "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
>
> > K. Clear for a final rc / release?
>
> Go for it, am just about to go run a training course
> now so won't be available until this arvo Melbourne
> time..
Seems fine with PGI, Intel and GCC on AMD64, so I
thought I'd give it a