At the moment I'm thinking SLES11 (and RHEL6) RPMs of 0.9.3 / TOT
installed in /opt[/sgi]/hwloc. I'd also add module support.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> How do you intend to ship hwloc? 0.9.2 with a couple of backported
> patches like this one?
>
> Samuel
> _
Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:23:02 -0600, a écrit :
> At the moment I'm thinking SLES11 (and RHEL6) RPMs of 0.9.3 / TOT
> installed in /opt[/sgi]/hwloc. I'd also add module support.
What do you mean by "module support"?
Samuel
Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot
of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under
/usr in the standard directories. This kept library paths and include
in default places but breaks down when you have multiple installations
of a product
Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:56:23 -0600, a écrit :
> Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot
> of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under
> /usr in the standard directories.
Ah, ok, right.
(module is so generic a name, yester
- "Samuel Thibault" wrote:
> What do you mean by "module support"?
http://modules.sourceforge.net/
They make managing multiple software installations
on clusters much much easier..
--
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
Looks great to me -- you appear to be a specfile wizard. :-)
Minor comments:
- Do you want to use a wildcard here instead of the specific .so
version number? That .so version number may change over time:
%{_libdir}/libhwloc.so.0
%{_libdir}/libhwloc.so.0.0.0
- In OMPI, I have a "buildrpm.s
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1406
Start time: Mon Nov 30 21:01:01 EST 2009
End time: Mon Nov 30 21:02:55 EST 2009
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
