Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1rc6r3006
Start time: Mon Jan 3 21:03:20 EST 2011
End time: Mon Jan 3 21:05:29 EST 2011
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.2a1r3005
Start time: Mon Jan 3 21:01:04 EST 2011
End time: Mon Jan 3 21:03:20 EST 2011
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 Jan 2011 23:43:18 +0100, a écrit :
> I just did a little word smything of the CPU and memory binding doxy and I'm
> *pretty sure* that I kept the same meaning. Can you double check?
>
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/3004
Checked, thanks!
Samuel
I just did a little word smything of the CPU and memory binding doxy and I'm
*pretty sure* that I kept the same meaning. Can you double check?
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/3004
Once you confirm, I'll bring it over to the v1.1 branch.
--
Jeff Squyres
[email protected]
For
Jiri Hladky, le Mon 03 Jan 2011 18:14:16 +0100, a écrit :
> I would like to check out if hwloc supports IBM's s390 architecture.
Hwloc's support on Linux is mostly linux-dependant. With the /sys stuff
being hardware-independant, it should in principle "just work" on s390,
provided the s390-specifi
Hello,
I would like to check out if hwloc supports IBM's s390 architecture. I have
been using hwloc on i386, x86-64 and ppc so far only.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S390
Fedora is about to support s390 and somebody has tried to build hwloc on
s390. There are several issues like missing numactl-