- "Samuel Thibault" wrote:
> What do you mean by "module support"?
http://modules.sourceforge.net/
They make managing multiple software installations
on clusters much much easier..
--
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian
Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:56:23 -0600, a écrit :
> Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot
> of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under
> /usr in the standard directories.
Ah, ok, right.
(module is so generic a name,
Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot
of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under
/usr in the standard directories. This kept library paths and include
in default places but breaks down when you have multiple installations
of a
Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:23:02 -0600, a écrit :
> At the moment I'm thinking SLES11 (and RHEL6) RPMs of 0.9.3 / TOT
> installed in /opt[/sgi]/hwloc. I'd also add module support.
What do you mean by "module support"?
Samuel
I don't know what has been announced and what hasn't, but hwloc
nicely solves a problem for us and I intend to make sure that it works
on all our hardware.
On 20 Nov 2009, at 23:55 , Chris Samuel wrote:
Hi Michael,
- "Michael Raymond" wrote:
Our architecture has
Hi Michael,
- "Michael Raymond" wrote:
> Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on
> them, and the blades are connected together in a
> CC-NUMA fashion.
I've heard on the grapevine that there will be memory
only blades too, which will have a Nehalem EX on them
but
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:54:43 +0100, a écrit :
> Introduce several numagroup types? How many? That's not easy to
> answer.
Or maybe we can add an "ignore" configuration function that also takes a
pair of depth parameters to ignore a range of depths for a given type.
Here you
NUMAGROUP sounds fine to me. Misc appears to be working for me though
and I'd like to start shipping hwloc on all our boxes in the next few
months.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:43:10 -0600, a écrit :
>> In one pattern I might want to place
Yes. Here's output from a small one of those with only 2 pre-release
blades.
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Michael Raymond wrote:
>> Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades
>> are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a
>> Node and the
Michael Raymond wrote:
> Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades
> are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a
> Node and the blades show up as Miscs.
So you're running on the Altix UV with Nehalem-EX that SGI announced at
SC? Is there
Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:18:53 -0600, a écrit :
> It looks like I spoke too soon on the fix. That solves the problem
> but it keeps the Miscs from being created and in some situations I'd
> like to keep the Miscs but not the nodes.
Oh? In which situation? Can't you just ignore
Michael Raymond, le Thu 19 Nov 2009 14:33:49 -0600, a écrit :
> --- hwloc-0.9.2/src/topology-linux.c 2009-11-03 16:40:31.0 -0600
> +++ hwloc-new//src/topology-linux.c 2009-11-19 14:20:43.630035434 -0600
> @@ -536,6 +536,10 @@
>struct dirent *dirent;
>hwloc_obj_t node;
>
> + if
12 matches
Mail list logo