Balaji, Pavan, le mar. 02 juin 2020 09:31:29 +, a ecrit:
> > On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:11 AM, Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users
> > wrote:
> >> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:10 AM, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
> >>> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Samuel Thibault
> >>> wrote:
> >>> could you check whether the attached
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:11 AM, Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users
> wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:10 AM, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Samuel Thibault
>>> wrote:
>>> could you check whether the attached patch avoids the warning?
>>> (we should really not need a cast to cons
Balaji, Pavan, le lun. 01 juin 2020 09:10:21 +, a ecrit:
> > On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Samuel Thibault
> > wrote:
> > could you check whether the attached patch avoids the warning?
> > (we should really not need a cast to const char*)
>
> The attached patch is basically the same as what we
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:10 AM, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> could you check whether the attached patch avoids the warning?
>> (we should really not need a cast to const char*)
>
> The attached patch is basically the same as what we are using, isn
Hi Samuel,
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> could you check whether the attached patch avoids the warning?
> (we should really not need a cast to const char*)
The attached patch is basically the same as what we are using, isn't it? It
does avoid the warning.
-- Pavan
Hello,
Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users, le lun. 01 juin 2020 03:39:02 +, a ecrit:
> We are seeing some warnings with the Intel compiler with hwloc (listed
> below). The warnings seem to be somewhat silly because there already is a
> cast to "char *" from the string literal,
Well, I'd agree w
Folks,
We are seeing some warnings with the Intel compiler with hwloc (listed below).
The warnings seem to be somewhat silly because there already is a cast to "char
*" from the string literal, but it seems to expect a cast to "const char *"
before casting to "char *". We are maintaining the
