[hwloc-users] Difference in core numbering for output formats

2017-02-02 Thread Gunter, David O
Can anyone explain why I get different outputs for Core IDs when using lstopo’s graphical output versus the text output I get with lstopo —only core? On a dual 10-core Sandy Bridge node I see two sets of cores, with IDs #0,1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,12. This corresponds with the core IDs I see if I cat

Re: [hwloc-users] Building hwloc for a Cray/KNL system

2017-01-27 Thread Gunter, David O
Hello, > > Gunter, David O, on Fri 27 Jan 2017 18:05:44 +, wrote: >> $ aprun -n 1 -L 193 ~hwloc-tt/bin/lstopo-no-graphics > > Does aprun give you allocation of all cores? By default lstopo only > shows the allocated cores. To see all of them, use t

[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for a Cray/KNL system

2017-01-27 Thread Gunter, David O
We have a Cray KNL system with hwloc 1.11.2 installed. When executing lstopo on a KNL node, I do not get any info on the cores and threads, the way I do on other Intel cpus. I downloaded and built the latest git version and built it, but it is giving me the same output (shown below). Has

[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for X11 on Mac OS X

2017-05-08 Thread Gunter, David O
I am trying to build the latest stable release of hwloc 1.11.7 for an El Capitan OS X system. I have a working X11 provide via XQuartz. I configure as such: $ configure --prefix= --with-x11 and the configure phase seems to find what it needs: ... checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib,

[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for X11 on Mac OS X

2017-05-08 Thread Gunter, David O
I am trying to build the latest stable release of hwloc 1.11.7 for an El Capitan OS X system. I have a working X11 provide via XQuartz. I configure as such: $ configure --prefix= --with-x11 and the configure phase seems to find what it needs: ... checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib,