Hi all,
I saw ko_KR.UTF-8 and ja_JP.UTF-8 XLC_LOCALE files has accepted into
CVS (#5421, Jungshik Shin). Is it sane to add zh_TW.UTF-8 and zh_CN.UTF-8
XLC_LOCALE also?
Also putting BIG5-0 for legacy support in UTF-8 is a right thing to do?
Regards,
Leon
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia
and let people only use
fonts with support for those glyphs?
I think the idea is to stick to its ISO10646-1:2000 codepoints as most
HKSCS fonts I have seen are only reference to these codepoints (which
within BMP).
Leon
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia-Pacific Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files
advertise support for:
zh, zh-cn, zh-tw, zh-sg, zh-mo
while older GB2312 fonts would be limited to
zh-cn, zh-sg
Keith PackardXFree86 Core TeamHP Cambridge Research Lab
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia-Pacific Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:http
.
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia-Pacific Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:http://people.redhat.com/llch
Legal:http://apac.redhat.com/disclaimer
___
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n