I have reviewed this document as part of the YANG doctors directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the
IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be
Roman,
Thanks for your guidance.:-)
Best Regards,
Paul
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 5:09 PM Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> Thanks for this revision and all of the iteration. I’ve advanced the
> document to IETF LC.
>
> Roman
>
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
> jaehoon.p.
Hi Paul!
Thanks for this revision and all of the iteration. I’ve advanced the document
to IETF LC.
Roman
On Jun 22, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Roman,
Thanks for your quick review.
I have reflected your suggested text on #12 in Section 8
Hi Roman,
Thanks for your quick review.
I have reflected your suggested text on #12 in Section 8 and
the mention about the lifecycle management from DMS in Section 3
on the version -13:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-13
- New Text for Security Issues and Discussion on
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Interface to Network Security Functions WG of
the IETF.
Title : Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security
Functions to Network-Based Security Services
