Hi Martin!
This document has been (completely) removed from the upcoming telechat agenda,
and the document is back in the WG. It will come back only after another the
updates are done, another WG LC, IETC LC, Directorate review, etc.
Roman
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Martin Duke
Sent: Monday, S
So do I understand correctly that this is going to defer from next
telechat, and I should review it at a later time?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:18 AM Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Magnus!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
> > Sent: Monday, September 28,
Hi Linda,
I agree at merging the NSF Capabilities Information Model Draft into the
NSF Capability Data Model Draft.
I will be able to work on the merging with the help of Susan and other
coauthors.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Paul
2020년 9월 29일 (화) 오전 1:00, Linda Dunbar 님이 작성:
> I2NSF WG,
>
>
>
> As
I2NSF WG,
As Diego has expressed that the original I2NSF capability information model was
based on a policy expression calculus suitable for manipulating high-level
policy expressions. The capability data model has been evolving in a quite
reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code a
Hi Magnus!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 10:35 AM
> To: i...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-mo...@ietf.org;
> dunbar...@gmail.com; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re:
Hi,
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:08 -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> Magnus:
>
> Do you have specific transport people that you have assigned to work on this
> review?
No, I missed that Roman had deferred this document and tried to look at it and
was personally unable to review it due to lack of conte
On 28/09/2020 10:01, Rafa Marin-Lopez wrote:
Hi Rob, Tom:
Renaming the modules sounds reasonable. With regard to have a different prefix,
it is also ok. Perhaps the easiest way is to solve this is the following:
instead of using -sdn- we could include -i2nsf- so we would have:
ietf-i2nsf-comm
Hi Rob, Tom:
Renaming the modules sounds reasonable. With regard to have a different prefix,
it is also ok. Perhaps the easiest way is to solve this is the following:
instead of using -sdn- we could include -i2nsf- so we would have:
ietf-i2nsf-common, ietf-i2nsf-ike, and ietf-i2nsf-ikeless. Thi
