you mean lenny+1 then so we'lll see sugar 0.84 in debian in about 1.5 years?
David
P.S. The worst thing right now would be a fork from Debian for Ubuntu.
We'd loose devs, credibility, major problems later down with a
remerge... please lets try and find a way to get ubuntu being what it
Gary C Martin wrote:
On 9 Feb 2009, at 16:41, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 9 Feb 2009, at 02:35, David Farning wrote:
I took another stab at the thank you page tonight. Added some logos
and whatnot:)
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/ThankYou
Are we missing any sponsors?
Is Christian
Absolutely great. Will she be working within schools.sugarlabs.org?
If so, I'd love to help as I have quite a bit of experience with
everything Moodle related and how teachers actually use it
David Van Assche
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:14 AM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
I would like us to be present at LinuxTag (24-27 June 2009) [1].
What do you think about a shared booth with the german OLPC association, OLPC
Deutschland e.V.?
regards,
Holger
Oh, awesome
Hi Simon,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Oh, awesome - sounds like a great idea to me.
:-)
One little thing I am
worried in general, is to make sure that people perceive Sugar Labs now
as something independent of OLPC, but that we share some of the goals. I
The quickest way to develop the Sugar brand (aside from the logo of
course) is color: something different from the XO's green (Pantone-361
if I remember correctly). I have looked at the logo page and see
possibilities. It doesn't have to be one color (although that may be
preferable), but it
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Oh, awesome - sounds like a great idea to me.
:-)
One little thing I am
worried in general, is to make sure that people perceive Sugar Labs now
as something independent of OLPC, but that we share
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
yeah, guess that would work. We could also put Sugarlabs marketing
material on one side, and OLPC Deutschland e.V. material on the other :)
(And then mix the people... :)
Sounds good.
so far people on olpc...@l.l.o also liked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David (and others),
[quotes reordered to not use TOFU[1] ]
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:16:19PM +0100, David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:29:15PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
we could prepare sugar 0.83 (or 0.84) in experimental, as long as we
dont want it in unstable...
Current packaging routines used for packaging Sugar for Debian cannot.
(did I not write
Hi Jonas,
please relax...
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If someone (me[1]) reorganize the packaging routines as already drafted
at the Alioth OLPC list, then it is not sponsoring but ordinary package
maintainance.
again, to clarify what I ment:
If someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:37:15PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
please relax...
Please stop posting noise that can be mistaken as invitation to break
what I build.
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If someone (me[1])
The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all but being released
in a stable Debian... Ubuntu LTS, btw... always backports its most
stable packages to it, so no, its not the same. Otherwise the state it
would be in as it was when it was released would be unusable...
remember the cachepixmaps
What might help is to have an 'add to calendar' link on the announcement
pages and in announcement emails, so one could add the item to one's
personal calendar.
David Farning-5 wrote:
Well, It seems that using google calendar was a flop:( It just added
another level of complexity without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:08:14PM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all
Compared to not-yet-released 0.84 or what do you mean?
Ubuntu LTS, btw... [detail snippet], so no, its not the same.
Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:43:24AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
Nice! Thanks!
/Ties
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
well, u can find it here: http://www.nubae.com/logs/sugar
There are various curious commands the bot can help with based on
google stuff the list is as follows:
[control command is @ and not
17 matches
Mail list logo
