On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
>
>
> On 04/20/2011 08:05 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK (please correct me) Uruguay is not providing code, thus in
>>> violation
>>> of GNU license, and this situ
Sean,
Your question about whether we could buy a phone number for incoming SL
calls came up today - we're trying to figure out how much money we have,
exactly, but also need some more information from you on what's needed
before we can make a call. Could you answer these questions, please?
T
Hi Mel, I responded to Walter's mail cc'd to SLOBs list, answers are here:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2011-April/003255.html
Sean
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Your question about whether we could buy a phone number for incoming SL
> calls came
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Gary Martin
wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of, but C. Scott Ananian might have some guidance on the
> matter once he is through his "The next four weeks" plan – he must be just
> hitting week three if still on track:
>
> http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667
Hello Community,
Below are notes from IRC meeting about Sugar Website Revamp last Night-
This should bring community up to date on our progress.
Our Co-op students from RIT Mike Devine and JT Mengel could use community
help. They are in charge of collecting content for our lead desig
The oversight board is considering a motion to upgrade the license of
Sugar from "GPLv2 or later" to "GPLv3 or later". Before proceeding to a
vote, we'd like to request feedback from the community. In particular,
we'd like to know how this change might affect you as a Sugar end-user,
distributor, c
At the SLOBs meeting a few hours ago, I was drafted (volunteered? was
asked? some willing combination of the two) to sketch out a basic
finance process, since we have a couple requests for funding in the
pipeline and don't really know how to handle them yet.
Here it is.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Q: Do we need to ask the permission of all copyright holders?
> A: No, we'll take advantage of the "or any later version" clause in the
> current license. We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
This isn't actually true. You
For the record, the two funding requests we have right now are:
* a phone number (requested by Sean Daly) -
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2011-April/003255.html
I translated this into a ticket so people could see what the format
looked like: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2791
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 18:47 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> wrote:
> > Q: Do we need to ask the permission of all copyright holders?
> > A: No, we'll take advantage of the "or any later version" clause in the
> > current license. We're not ret
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Isn't this exactly what I wrote?
No, you wrote:
Q: How is the actual license change done?
A: We need to replace the COPYING file in the source code and update the
headers of all source files. This operation can easily be automated.
whic
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> (Ironically, moving to GPLv3 is taking freedoms *away* from users of
>> Sugar).
>
> Which freedoms are being taken away from the users of Sugar?
You are taking away the right to distribute Sugar under the GPLv2.
--scott
--
( htt
Am 22.04.2011 00:46, schrieb Mel Chua:
> At the SLOBs meeting a few hours ago
Are minutes or the log available from that meeting? Couldn't find a link
to them yet on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes
Thanks,
Christoph
--
Christoph Derndorfer
co-editor, www.olpcnews.com
e-mail
Hi Christoph,
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
> Am 22.04.2011 00:46, schrieb Mel Chua:
>> At the SLOBs meeting a few hours ago
>
> Are minutes or the log available from that meeting? Couldn't find a link
> to them yet on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes
Log's
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
>> Am 22.04.2011 00:46, schrieb Mel Chua:
>>> At the SLOBs meeting a few hours ago
>>
>> Are minutes or the log available from that meeting? Couldn't find a link
>> to them yet o
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Walter Bender wrote:
>> Log's at http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/2011-04-21#i_2660201
>
> The links are in the wiki now as well. Not sure where all the meeting
> minutes went to... need to investigate.
We had another "meeting" afterwards, that's why it looks li
Am 22.04.2011 02:45, schrieb Chris Ball:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> Log's at http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/2011-04-21#i_2660201
>>
>> The links are in the wiki now as well. Not sure where all the meeting
>> minutes went to... need to investigate.
>
> We h
As per the new http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Finance I'm asking for Sugar
Labs to sponsor my airfare to Montevideo
Sugar Summit EduJAM http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Uruguay_Summit_2011.
Here's the description that can also be found at the ticket I created
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2792
Th
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:45:05PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Walter Bender wrote:
> >> Log's at http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/2011-04-21#i_2660201
> >
> > The links are in the wiki now as well. Not sure where all the meeting
> > minutes went to... need to
19 matches
Mail list logo
