On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 03:38 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
That is the position of the FSF. However, a very wide community of
practice has adopted the GPL for its share and share alike
mechanics.
In that sense, I stand squarely on the same position as Linus and
other kernel hackers. I have
Hi Caryl,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Is there a link that tells what is included (Sugar Activities, Gnome(?))
etc. on each build of SoaS? I poked around a bit on the Sugar Labs wiki,
but couldn't find it.
The list for SoaS v5
Hi Bernie,
thanks for the thoughtful response. The use by employees area is
something I need to study further, as I suspect is more complex than
what you're describing.
On the tivoization part...
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-23
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote:
From the olpc-uruguay list in an unrelated thread:
Si utilizamos las claves de desarrollador (que son las que permiten hacer
cualquier cosa en la maquina), pero al momento solo se entregan por
solicitudes
==Sugar Digest==
1. Amidst all the heated discussion about software licenses, it is
worth stepping back a moment to see what people are actually doing on
the ground with Sugar. Check out
http://proyectofedora.org/argentina/?p=320 for an example of how
Turtle Art has been modified by some of our
Hi Gary, Tom, and Peter,
Thanks for the lists and chart. Now I can see why some of the favorites aren't
included on SoaS... too many problems! It would be nice, however, if you could
get at least one of the Tam Tams to work... maybe Mini? It would be the
logical one because it doesn't
Am 24.04.2011 18:38, schrieb Walter Bender:
4. In a follow-up exercise to the Massachusetts 4th Grade math project
[http://wiki.suagrlabs.org/go/Math4Team], Claudia Urrea and I have
been developing a correlation between Sugar activities and the Florida
4th-Grade math curriculum (See
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Likewise, Sugar Labs has an obligation to act on all GPL violations
reported on Sugar Labs copyrighted code. But we cannot act on our own
if we do not hold copyright.
Minor technical note here -- SL has a right, but
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 07:53 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Wait a moment: neither the GPLv2 nor the GPLv3 has ever put any
limitation on the way you can *use* the software. One could use GPLv3
software to murder people or to implement DRM.
Except that antitivoization clauses provide for
[cc += christoph]
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 21:25 -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
i think i've missed the point of all this. bernie's original mail
points to the FSF rationale for GPL3 as the reason for moving sugar to
GPL3, but somehow i think there must be more to it. i.e., what
exactly are the
10 matches
Mail list logo
