Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Testing of Activities

Hi Walter, Based on my understanding of the GitHub process, I posted issues documenting the problems. Tony On 04/20/2017 12:09 AM, Walter Bender wrote: In the meantime, it may make sense to walk through all of the repos in sugarlabs on GH and ensure that those with changes get updated versio

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] Testing of Activities

I posted issues for each indicating the results of the tests. Tony On 04/19/2017 08:50 PM, Walter Bender wrote: Do you have the details re the broken activities? regards. -walter On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Tony Anderson > wrote: I spent the last two

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Testing of Activities

In the meantime, it may make sense to walk through all of the repos in sugarlabs on GH and ensure that those with changes get updated version numbers, new .xo and .gtar files, and we update ASLO and downloads. It seems our only mechanism for doing this is manual at the moment. Tony, if you publish

Re: [IAEP] Testing of Activities

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > I spent the last two plus days testing the 137 activities with repositories > in github/sugarlabs. Thank you for this effort, clearly additional follow up is required and I hope it occurs. > Localization also needs some attention. The setup

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] Testing of Activities

Do you have the details re the broken activities? regards. -walter On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > I spent the last two plus days testing the 137 activities with > repositories in github/sugarlabs. > > Of these, 103 work on Ubuntu 16.04 sucrose. This leaves 34 which do