; Gonzalo
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> By the way, if we decide to do it I think we should do it *before* the
>> meeting, so that we triage using github already and we don't risk to lose
>> information
By the way, if we decide to do it I think we should do it *before* the
meeting, so that we triage using github already and we don't risk to lose
information (or to have a really hard time fixing the script to preserve
it).
On 19 April 2014 02:03, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I tried
I tried to do a migration using trac2github. Here is what it looks like
https://github.com/dnarvaez/test/issues/258
It's missing the reporter and it's not filtering by component but these
should be easy to add (it's php sigh, but still...).
On 19 April 2014 01:03, Daniel
de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 10 April 2014 22:08, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> > What I'm saying is that the "would be nice" to fix will never be
>> > fixed,
On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > What I'm saying is that the "would be nice" to fix will never be
> > fixed, they will keep accumulating and we will waste triage time on
> >
gt; of a project
> where we have volunteers some times more, some times less.
>
> Just my two cents ...of pesos :)
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
> What I'm saying is that the "would be nice" to fix will neve
instead of "minor", but we need a
> way
> to separate the tickets we _need_ fix, the tickets we _want_ fix,
> and the tickets _would_be_nice_ fix.
> We have almost 250 tickets, if we can solve 50 tickets in these 2 months,
> is important know what are the best candidates.
ed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
> > sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get right without
> >
Yes! I agree.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
> > sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get rig
Finally, something I think is important is to set enhancement vs defect. It
doesn't take much effort and it's very useful when we are feature frozen.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
>
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get right without
spending a lot of time really but maybe helpful for contributors even if
not very accurate.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM,
On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez
>
> > wrote:
>
>> This is an interesting blog post with a paragraph about GNOME triaging
>>
>> http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/enabling-participat
sugar-meeting todo el día.
> Por favor, únase a la diversión.
>
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugar
fd = Pango.FontDescription('Monospace')
> +view_license.modify_font(fd)
> view_license.show()
> expander.add(view_license)
> else:
> _______
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop pro
;ll enjoy it, it's my Christmas gift to the Sugar community :-)
>
> Best regards from France.
>
> Lionel.
>
> P.S.: Source code is available on https://github.com/llaske/Sugarizer
>
>
>
> ___
> Sug
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz
>
> These are now built for Fedora 21/rawhide.
>
> Peter
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
-0.101.0.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz
A lot of people contributed to this release. Thanks to everyone!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop pr
; Luke Faraone
> > Membership and Elections Committee
> > Sugar Labs
>
> Cheers,
>
> Luke
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
http://pockey.dao2.com/2013/11/education-freedom-day-celebrations-18-january-2014/
Sad that Sugar is not even mentioned.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
sure GCI will inspire you.
We are doing great progress and it's being a lot of fun. I'm mostly giving
you chance to tackle some of the issues before the students fix them all :)
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education P
what we primarily want from educational software?
>> > Although there is plenty of room for improvement, Sugar has this
>> quality and
>> > an installed base to support this claim, and should not be afraid of
>> this
>> > course.
>> > A strong market presence and user endorsement is actually much better
>> than
>> > any PR event or political/academic endorsement in enhancing its appeal
>> and
>> > removing the "3rd world/class" label from the project.
>> > So please consider distributing Sugar .106 through GooglePlay/Appstore!
>> > ___
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Marketing mailing list
>> > market...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>> >
>>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
; curriculum based projects. As time goes on, more Activities could be added
> to updates.
>
>
> Recruiting for this project could reach out to new volunteers at places
> like SCaLE and Linux Users Groups. I would love to help work with a small
&g
:
> First, we need to decide what are those strategic things.
>
> -walter
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > I wonder if we should try to use bountysource.com to fund a few things
> we
> > consider strategic for Sugar Labs.
> >
I wonder if we should try to use bountysource.com to fund a few things we
consider strategic for Sugar Labs.
Just an idea.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
Yes with dependencies I also meant the version of them (for API
incompatible versions at least).
I'm all for getting concrete :)
On Thursday, 7 November 2013, David Farning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Re library versions, th
on and stability was Sugar
> .98 on Ubuntu 12.04. The next decision point will be which version of
> Sugar to use for the 14.04 release due in the second quarter of 2014.
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Cool stuff.
> >
> >
port. Anish has
> the deepest understanding of timelines and objectives.
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've
ink of is testing for a
SUGAR_WEBKIT_VERSION environment variable, set perhaps by a /usr/bin/sugar
patched by the rpms.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
> >
> > If we want to support WebKit1, I think we should do it upstream then. I'm
> > still not thrilled about that but not opposed to it either.
>
> Good. We can see what is the better way to do it.
;ve had a few false starts trying to port Measure to GST 1.0. Once I
> get that working, Turtle Art will follow (that is why I still haven't
> released the GTK 3 version of Turtle Art).
>
> -walter
>
> >
> > Gonzalo
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:40
Gstreamer 0.10 is part of what I'm calling gtk2 toolkit, it's not
completely accurate but we have been using than terminology. So it seems we
are going to run into the issue of gtk2 toolkit pieces disappearing earlier
then I expected.
I think you can move to gst 1.0 only if you already ported to g
On 6 November 2013 17:38, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> >
> > On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Web
I forgot a note about toolkits
* The gtk2 toolkit is deprecated and frozen but it will be supported as
long as possible (at some point I guess some dependencies might start
disappearing from distributions, making that problematic). The gtk3 toolkit
is supported, backward API compatibility is guara
On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
> >
> > Please elaborate :)
> >
> > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms
> (WebKit1
> > and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain)
On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
> > Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've not tried it as I
> > don't have HW but I don't see any reason they shouldn't work OOTB.
>
> Yep. Sugar is running in classmates out of the box. In Uruguay for
> example.
>
You mean people ar
res to propose them to invest on
> that.
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> > 2013/11/6 Peter Robinson :
> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Na
On 6 November 2013 16:12, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > * Wait and see what happens with the XO. Support existing deployments by
> > producing images with the most recent Sugar release. Stick to a Fedora 18
> > base system, the work to upgrade is highly non trivial. Provide custom
> rpms
> > for the
ris, which should help with hardware
support.
As you might have noticed there is no Sugar on Android, other than for
drivers support and web activities running in a web browser. I don't think
going beyhond those gives us any real advantage.
Just my $0.02
--
tegic decisions" while it ignores the
> feedback from deployments.
>
> I think this whole issue of android and html5, is a very grave mistake,
> probably the last.
>
> But hey, I'm just a teacher, probably the only one in this list.
>
>
> 2013/11/5 Daniel Na
Oh, awesome, COPR seems to be exactly what we need.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow
> with
> > Fedora is that
ter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow
> with
> > Fedora is that we don't have a good way to develop unstable Sugar on a
> > stable Fedora. Rawhid
hough maybe now that the gi conversion is over we can avoid that.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Walter Bender
> >
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> > >
> wrote:
> >> On 4 N
doesn't need 3D. The i.MX6 devices (WandBard, Utilite,
> CuBox-i etc) should have accelerated graphics in the F-21 time frame.
>
> Peter
>
> > On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
&
Do you know what's the status of graphics with the BeagleBone Black?
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson
> > >
> wrote:
> >&g
Thanks a lot for the feedback Peter. I will check these out.
For the record, I was thinking about Sugar on Linux on Raspberry, not
Android.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > On 4 November
orking OS? Will deployments be able to
work with something like that? It even requires to ctrl-d on every boot...
I sort of wish the ARM vendors started to use secure uefi, and that's
saying it all :/
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Dani
;);>;
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org 'sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org');>;
> iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org 'iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org');>;
> olpc-...@lists.laptop.org 'olpc-...@lists.laptop.org');>
> > Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [Sur]
tactile devices. Unfortunately it's not clear to me
that any of these devices is open enough to be viable for deployments or
"ordinary" users.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
> marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
> essentially unusable and have a terrible experience.
Can you elaborate on why you think it would be a terri
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY wrote:
> * It's not clear to me where we are going.
>
I'm afraid you are not the only one feeling that way. It's much easier said
than done, but we need to figure out where we are going and to communicate
it clearly inside the community.
__
:)
On 5 November 2013 00:23, Chris Leonard wrote:
> I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
>
> cjl
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mo
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>> wrote:
>> > Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
>> I'll
>>
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
> I'll
> > open a bug + patch.
>
> Thanks! Let me know when you've got a p
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll open a bug + patch.
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch
it with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
>
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lo
work for you and if they need
> to be fixed ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Christophe
>
>
> On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
>> that others might find use
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.100.0.tar.xz
Thanks to everyone that contributed with code, translations and testing!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
plain why the result depends on what is already on the drive?
Thanks
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Hello,
I setup a buildbot instance to build the packages daily, using the XO as a
build slave for arm
http://sugarlabs.org:8011/waterfall
https://github.com/dnarvaez/archbot
You can pull them by adding this to your /etc/pacman.conf
[sugar]
SigLevel = Never
Server = http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvae
On 7 October 2013 05:14, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> El 05/10/13 18:59, Daniel Narvaez escribió:
>
> * AUR -git packages for the Sugar core and the browse activity. They
>> makes it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
>> laptop, not on the XO
On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
> that others might find useful.
>
> * A trivial script to build minimal images for the XO. It builds a kernel
> from the OLPC git repositor
e activity. They makes
it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
laptop, not on the XO yet).
All of these are very much a work in progress. I'm posting them mostly
because they might be of interest for Arch Linux users. Patches and bug
reports both appreciated!
--
On 13 September 2013 18:56, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> > Just to clarify:
> > 1. OLPC-A's intention is to create a HTML5+JS framework for creating
> > Sugar Activities.
>
> A small correction: activities using web technologies has been
> discussed for a while in the Sugar community, and is now bei
>> app?
>>
>> Has there been any conversation on this that I missed?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Sameer
>> --
>> Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
>> Professor, Information Systems
>> San Francisco State University
>> http://verma.sfsu.edu/
>> http://commons.sfsu.edu/
>> http://olpcsf.org/
>> http://olpcjamaica.org.jm/
>>
>> ___ IAEP -- It's An Education
>> Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org> 'cvml', 'IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org');>
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
a, Ph.D.
> Professor, Information Systems
> San Francisco State University
> http://verma.sfsu.edu/
> http://commons.sfsu.edu/
> http://olpcsf.org/
> http://olpcjamaica.org.jm/
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Pro
functional datastore
support in the web activities
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gwebsockets/gwebsockets-0.3.tar.gz
Enjoy! Also, please help with testing and bug fixing:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2013-August/044483.html
--
Daniel Narvaez
Great. Simon if you have time a review would be really helpful :)
On 31 July 2013 22:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2013 18:52, "Daniel Narvaez" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is the first feature frozen release. We landed all the features
>
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.99.3.tar.xz
--
Daniel Narvaez
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Daniel Narvaez*
Date: Thursday, 27 June 2013
Subject: Sugar 0.99.0 (unstable)
To: "sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org"
Hello,
this is the first development release of the cycle that will bring us to
0.100.
Highlights:
* Comments box in t
;
> We are also open to speakers who want to share their perspectives and
> experiences to take the project further. Please head to hack.olpcdel.orgto
> find out more. We can also be reached at
> olpcde...@gmail.com .
>
> --
> OLPC Delhi
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Same thing, they also have system api.
On 22 May 2013 21:23, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma wrote:
> >>
> >> Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was w
On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma wrote:
> Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was wondering how many
> of the HTML5 apps from FirefoxOS would slide over to our platform with
> little change. I just got my hands on a Geeksphone Peak
> (http://www.geeksphone.com/) and have been followi
On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien wrote:
> Sean DALY writes:
>
> > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
>
> Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
> reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
> Sugar is in its early alpha (which is
Thanks so much for the well thought feedback, Sean.
On 17 May 2013 18:04, Sean DALY wrote:
> We can't go with 1.0 unless we change the numbering system.
>
> The current system means it will take another decade to get to v3.0. I and
> perhaps others will have far more grey hair by then.
>
Couple
It seems like we have agreement on going 1.0 so far. Unless someone speak
up I'm going to make that the plan in a couple of days.
On 17 May 2013 15:07, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we need to decide if we want the next release to be 1.0 or 0.100.
>
> Here is the feat
developer point of view we are not ready.
Otherwise we could delay it at least another cycle.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
/github.com/cscott/nell-colors
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 13 April 2013 15:37, wrote:
> > 1 Android kernel + Ported linux libraries + Sugar
> > 2 Android kernel + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar rewritten
> in
> > HTML
> > 3 Full Android + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar activities
> > rewritten in HTML
> > 4 Full Android + Da
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
> > Android]
>
> Answering myself:
> http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=170
On 13 April 2013 03:21, wrote:
> The issue of the considerable resources required to transition to Android
> has been raised. Is there any possibility of getting financial support from
> Google or Samsung etc for the project?
>
Maybe the board could investigate if there are any financial support
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
> > Android]
>
> Answering myself:
> http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=170
On 13 April 2013 03:21, wrote:
> I would like to see all these questions discussed further. I would like
> the technical implementation discussions to be more contextualised in terms
> of user experience.
>
Hi Tony,
let me try contextualize, for what I know so far.
I think these are the possib
On 13 April 2013 01:36, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hi Anish,
>
> that's interesting.
>
> First impressions from a quick look. There isn't really much documentation
> so I won't promise this is fully accurate :)
>
> Ubuntu is running in a chroot on the top o
x27;m not sold on the idea, but I guess it should be part a discussion
> and research efforts concerning sugar's future.
>
> Best,
> Anish
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
>> On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>>> T
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY wrote:
> The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn't
> currently have the resources to make an Android offer available anytime
> soon. But: now is the time. I believe fundraising is vital to achieve this
> goal, at the very least to f
On 12 April 2013 23:40, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Would it be possible to, instead of trying to port all of Sugar to
> Android, start with a few key Activities?
>
I think that's the idea. Porting the whole Sugar to Android would involve
porting a lot of system components and then likely having to m
>
> 5. Walter Bender landed several patches to add a comment box to journal
> entries. It will be populated both by the Portfolio activity and by the web
> services integration which is being worked on. The obligatory screenshot
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/4/4a/FB-commen
6. All in all I think we made great progress planning the next release. But
we will need everyone help to execute and make it a really good one.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sug
On 21 February 2013 09:35, Ron Feigenblatt wrote:
> The big news is that OLPC reports potential buyers have expressed
> interest in Android, so it has a plan to move the XO-4 that way by
> YE2013. This poses an implicit challenge to Sugar Labs, namely, could
> Sugar sit on top of Android rather th
ary 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> It already works fine on the Fedora releases for Sugar.
>
> Peter
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wrote:
> > Perhaps a good opportunity to get Sugar in the hands of more kids
> >
> >
Perhaps a good opportunity to get Sugar in the hands of more kids
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jan/29/google-raspberry-pi-s
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
On 26 November 2012 15:58, Samy Boutayeb wrote:
> Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 15:36 +0100, Daniel Narvaez a écrit :
>> On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis wrote:
>> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500
>> > Walter Bender wrote:
>> >> 3. Daniel Narva
On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500
> Walter Bender wrote:
>> 3. Daniel Narvaez has made a number of improvements to sugar-build
>> [5], which has by-and-large replaced sugar-jhbuild as the preferred
>> development en
96 matches
Mail list logo
