On Dienstag, 26. April 2011, nanon...@mediagala.com wrote:
No, The plan Ceibal don't give the root access neither a developer key
for programmers, with the new OS upgrade.
are those XOs regularily updated or would it be rather easy to possible
create a somewhat lasting jailbreak-application?
Hi Simon,
(full quote for the benefit of olpc...@l.d.o)
On Dienstag, 1. September 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
some of you may know, I am doing a Sugar Pilot here in Germany. I try to
keep my blog (listed on the sugarlabs planet as well) about my findings
up to date [1].
Oh, great!!
Is
Hi,
On Dienstag, 7. April 2009, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:44:07AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Have you considered driving to Paris?
Yes, I have (see my first reply). Unless someone else is coming with us
(and providing a car), I would need to check with our carsharing
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
We'd need someone with some free time to volunteer for this job.
If you use the commandline tool listadmin the job is really easy to do.
regards,
Holger (who moderates quite a few lists with it, which costs me
probably a
Hi David,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, David Van Assche wrote:
The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all
As said before, if there are problems related to particular packaging in
Debian, please file bugs. (For example I still need to test whether
read+write are really broken on
Hi Simon,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Oh, awesome - sounds like a great idea to me.
:-)
One little thing I am
worried in general, is to make sure that people perceive Sugar Labs now
as something independent of OLPC, but that we share some of the goals. I
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
yeah, guess that would work. We could also put Sugarlabs marketing
material on one side, and OLPC Deutschland e.V. material on the other :)
(And then mix the people... :)
Sounds good.
so far people on olpc...@l.l.o also liked
Hi Jonas,
please relax...
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If someone (me[1]) reorganize the packaging routines as already drafted
at the Alioth OLPC list, then it is not sponsoring but ordinary package
maintainance.
again, to clarify what I ment:
If someone
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Yeah, perhaps we can get something done at FOSDEM? Friday afternoon?
Sounds like a plan :) I will arrive Friday noon in Brussels and have the
afternoon free for sugar... is there a space to meet and hack now?
We'll have more meetings
Hi,
this is one of these mails which stayed in I should reply to this too
long... :/
On Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So your, or any other sugar developers, attendency would certainly be
welcome.
Ok, how could I help? Any subject I could talk about? Workshops to prepare?
Hi Martin,
On Montag, 26. Januar 2009, Martin Sevior wrote:
One of the things that Debian needs to do to package sugar is to
distribute AbiWord as libAbiword with a small binary wrapper. This has
been done for Fedora. We've told the AbiWord Debian packager about
this but it hasn't happened
Hi Tomeu,
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 12:33, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I could attend if there was interest in having a Sugar hacker there.
Do you have any plans that include Sugar somehow?
We have a sugar-desktop profile which in theory allows to install a sugar
desktop. (In practice its broken,
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 02:03, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
Daniel mentioned FOSDEM during our weekend meeting in Brussels and we
thought it might be a good opportunity to have a European OLPC / Sugar
grassroots meeting either in the two days before or after the actual event.
I'll
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 21:12, Walter Bender wrote:
Alas, I will be in Tasmania... couldn't get much farther from
Trondheim if I tried.
Heh. Enjoy LCA!
Debian Edu has many regular developer meetings, there is one in December,
there was one in October and I'm sure the one in January
Hi,
sugar-calculate-activity
sugar-chat-activity
sugar-memorize-activity
sugar-pippy-activity
sugar-web-activity
sugar-sharingtest-activity
are all effected by serious bugs which can either be fixed via t-p-u or with
new upstream versions via unstable. (Or via removals of the affected
Hi,
additionaly to what Bert said:
to summarize _my understanding_ again: there is source, there is just no ascii
representation of the source / you cannot compile the source to binaries.
Because the source comes as blobs (being the VM in it's state), which can be
edited inside the virtual
Hi,
On Friday 07 November 2008 14:39, David Van Assche wrote:
the only option seems to
seperate squeak from sugar, if sugar is to get into main or universe.
thats not an option, but it's the (fine) status quo. there are these things
called packages...
regards,
Holger, who also
Hi,
thanks from me to Jecel for clarifications too!
On Friday 07 November 2008 19:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The Squeak image Etoys (the only one currently packaged officially for
Debian) is in non-free due to ftpmasters judging it not possible for
the security team to maintain throughout
Hi,
On Thursday 06 November 2008 04:48, Walter Bender wrote:
As of this summer, all of the code contained in our Squeak Etoys
version 4.0 is covered by either the Apache 2.0 or MIT Licenses.
Yup.
Even for etoys 3.0.1916+svn132-2 licencing or copyright issues are _not_ the
reason why its in
19 matches
Mail list logo
