On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 03:36, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 1 Nov 2009, at 22:06, Chris Ball wrote:
Dear Sugar folks,
This mail didn't get any replies, but it's important to know whether
people agree with it before going ahead. So, please understand that:
*
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 22:36, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
* Existing bug data will be imported, but the bug numbers won't be the
same.
So the git commit messages referencing trac bug tickets will be future
information garbage, oh joy.
As stated, there will be both a
I have no experience with Launchpad, but am often frustrated by the
performance of SL Trac.
At my office we switched from Trac to Redmine for internal project
development, since Trac's development seems to have slowed to a crawl.
Provided a high priority is placed on migrating bug numbers and
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:19, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no experience with Launchpad, but am often frustrated by the
performance of SL Trac.
At my office we switched from Trac to Redmine for internal project
development, since Trac's development seems to have slowed to a
Dear Sugar folks,
This mail didn't get any replies, but it's important to know whether
people agree with it before going ahead. So, please understand that:
* bugs.sugarlabs.org is moving from Trac to Launchpad.
* Existing bug data will be imported, but the bug numbers won't be the
same.
* It
On 1 Nov 2009, at 22:06, Chris Ball wrote:
Dear Sugar folks,
This mail didn't get any replies, but it's important to know whether
people agree with it before going ahead. So, please understand that:
* bugs.sugarlabs.org is moving from Trac to Launchpad.
Ouch, oh my that's a bolt from the
