--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I started working on the goals for 0.84 in the wiki:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84#Goals
Here is what I have so far.
* Next generation journal
* File sharing
* Collaboration scalability
* Responsive UI
* Stable activities API
* Official Sugar L
Hi
I note that, following the link, Trac #6128 says:
There has been much discussion about how to achieve grouping in the journal,
and whether to move towards a hierarchical structure, like directories and
subdirectories on a normal file system. In the current design, tags are
intended to be th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I remain unconvinced that a journal, even with enhanced tagging and
searching, is the best solution.
I am pretty well convinced.
| While making things easier for novice users, (the "low entry"), it takes
away the "high ceil
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 10:48 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>
> | The journal is OK but should it be the only tool available to the user?
> Isn't the best file system the one which most empowers the user?
>
> How does the Journal fail to empower the user? With tagging and
> versioning, the Jo
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | I remain unconvinced that a journal, even with enhanced tagging and
> searching, is the best solution.
>
> I am pretty well convinced.
I've got a few additions...
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I started working on the goals for 0.84 in the wiki:
>
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84#Goals
>
> Here is what I have so far.
>
> * Next generation journa
Benjamin M. Schwartz writes:
> forster at ozonline.com.au wrote:
>> I remain unconvinced that a journal, even with enhanced
>> tagging and searching, is the best solution.
>
> I am pretty well convinced.
You're using it exclusively, right...? (no bash, no MacOS, etc.)
If it's not good enough for
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin M. Schwartz writes:
>> forster at ozonline.com.au wrote:
>
>>> I remain unconvinced that a journal, even with enhanced
>>> tagging and searching, is the best solution.
>>
>> I am pretty well convinced.
>
> You're
victor rajewski writes:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Albert Cahalan
> wrote:
>> You're using it exclusively, right...? (no bash, no MacOS, etc.)
>>
>> If it's not good enough for you, then it's definitely not good
>> enough to be forced on other people.
>
> That would be like expecting gnom
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> victor rajewski writes:
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Albert Cahalan
>> wrote:
>
>>> You're using it exclusively, right...? (no bash, no MacOS, etc.)
>>>
>>> If it's not good enough for you, then it's definitely not
10 matches
Mail list logo
