On 01.03.2010, at 10:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Should sugar be closed education environment with activities created(in
python) only for sugar or sugar provides programming languages agnostic
services (Journal, Collab oriented features) that could be used by
*existed* education applications
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:31:14AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.03.2010, at 10:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Should sugar be closed education environment with activities created(in
python) only for sugar or sugar provides programming languages agnostic
services (Journal, Collab
Aleksey,
My thought was that we could include the JRE in SoaS and in Sugar on
the XO 1.5 but other than that provide no support for creating
Activities in Java. Sort of like we do with Gnash. You could write a
limited sort of Activity in Flash using hulahop and that subset of
Flash that Gnash
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:11:24AM -0600, James Simmons wrote:
Aleksey,
My thought was that we could include the JRE in SoaS and in Sugar on
the XO 1.5 but other than that provide no support for creating
Activities in Java. Sort of like we do with Gnash. You could write a
limited sort of
Gary,
I guess here is the core misunderstanding, in my mind situation is not (or
shouldn't) look like
Lets make all education software sugar
but
Lets provide sugar features (Journal, collab intergration etc) for
existed education software (and of course write new, within sugar,
...@member.fsf.org
Subject: [IAEP] [POLL] Non Sugar Platform activities in Activity
Library
To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Cc: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Message-ID: 20100228022630.gb17...@antilopa-gnu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
___
IAEP
- Forwarded message from Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org -
From: Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [POLL] Non Sugar Platform activities in Activity
Library
To: Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com
Cc: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Date: Sun, 28 Feb
