Hola!
De acuerdo con Dave cuando manifiesta que:
I suggest adding this to the next SLOB meeting agenda as a discussion point
(and possible immediate motion :)
This is a side issue though; the primary concerns of Caryl and myself that
we would appreciate SLOB guidance on are - what criteria should
On 18 Aug 2016 3:02 a.m., "Dave Crossland" wrote:
>
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 21:32, Walter Bender wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm fine with that, but is seems to be a change in policy.
>>
>>
>>
>> We'll have to trust that they are Sugar users. Why would they want to
join if they had no interest in the project
On 17 August 2016 at 21:32, Walter Bender wrote:
> I'm fine with that, but is seems to be a change in policy.
>
>
We'll have to trust that they are Sugar users. Why would they want to join
> if they had no interest in the project? (I suppose we could get invaded by
> trolls, in which case we can
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 21:11, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 17 August 2016 at 20:54, Walter Bender
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Dave Crossla
On 17 August 2016 at 21:11, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 August 2016 at 20:54, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>>
On 17 August 2016 at 20:41, Walter Bender
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 20:54, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 17 August 2016 at 20:41, Walter Bender
>>> wrote:
>>>
I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approv
On 17 August 2016 at 20:54, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 August 2016 at 20:41, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
>>> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 20:41, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
>> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-vis committees is to
>> appoint a representative. So I don't t
On 17 August 2016 at 20:41, Walter Bender wrote:
> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-vis committees is to
> appoint a representative. So I don't think we need a motion.
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 7 August 2016 at 10:44, Sebastian Silva
> wrote:
>
>>
>> In order to be appointed to Membership and Election committee a SLOBS
>> vote was necessary
>
>
> Ah yes, Seb invited me to join in the non-quorum meeting, and I see that
> this
10 matches
Mail list logo