Thanks, I'll review it.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I've found a moment to make Moon (JS) work in Sugar again. The version
> in the original repo was only missing a small patch.
>
> https://github.com/zhirzh/sugarizer-activity-moon/pull/13
>
Hi James,
I've found a moment to make Moon (JS) work in Sugar again. The version
in the original repo was only missing a small patch.
https://github.com/zhirzh/sugarizer-activity-moon/pull/13
Hope you find it useful,
Regards,
Sebastian
On 12/05/17 19:58, James Cameron wrote:
> I'm probably g
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:23:55PM -0400, Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease
> > > activities management, for both image builders and developers.
>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:15:06AM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
>
> On 17/05/17 00:47, James Cameron wrote:
>
> Can someone explain the relationship between ASLO and Sugar network?
>
> Nobody has answered your question, so I'll have a go.
>
> A derivative relationship; data flo
On 17/05/17 00:47, James Cameron wrote:
>> Can someone explain the relationship between ASLO and Sugar network?
> Nobody has answered your question, so I'll have a go.
>
> A derivative relationship; data flows from ASLO to Sugar Network.
>
> Any changes you make in ASLO that affect how the data i
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:23:55PM -0400, Samuel Cantero wrote:
> Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease
> > activities management, for both image builders and developers.
>
> Please also consider Sugar Network, which Sebastian know
>
> Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease
> > activities management, for both image builders and developers.
>
> Please also consider Sugar Network, which Sebastian knows about, and
> is used heavily, judging by the hit counts on the Sugar Labs ser
I'm using 13.2.7 . I would use the workaround. Thanks.
*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:58 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Thanks. Are you using 13.2.8?
>
> The Fedora repositories for Fedora 18 moved, and this was fixed in
> 13.2.8, see here;
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_not
Yes, that's why I asked. Installing VLC doesn't work out of the box
with 13.2.8, and there are different ways it could be done. I don't
know what Ibiam did. I need to know before I can reproduce.
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Samson Goddy wrote:
> $> su -
> #> yum localinstall -
$> su -
#> yum localinstall --nogpgcheck
https://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-$(rpm
-E %fedora).noarch.rpm
#> yum install vlc
#> yum install python-vlc npapi-vlc (optionals)
Can help, yum install vlc will not work until you use this. At least that
how i go
Thanks. Are you using 13.2.8?
The Fedora repositories for Fedora 18 moved, and this was fixed in
13.2.8, see here;
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/13.2.7#Fedora_Repositories_Missing
If you are using 13.2.7 or earlier, please use the workaround on that
page.
I've just tested "sudo yum i
Hey James, since you're still maintaining fedora18, "sudo yum vlc" - any
activity- returns this error "Error cannot retrieve metalink for repository
fedora18/i386" , editing the *fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ and
changing
all "https" to "http" solves the problem.
*Ibiam Chihurumnaya*
On
Composite reply to several posts, in context, see below;
Samson wrote:
> I think we should really join the trend so that we can get more
> people using Sugar for Learning. So what are your thought on this
> development?
I don't think it will work, as we don't have developers interested in
it. I
At Dominican Republic, ~750 XO are running latest version of Sugar.
On May 12, 2017 1:25 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote:
Do those xo run the latest release?
On May 12, 2017 1:01 PM, "Samuel Cantero" wrote:
> I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python codebase
> and I guess
Cool :)
I'm excited about the GSOC projects!! :)
On 12 May 2017 at 13:42, Samuel Cantero wrote:
> No yet. But I know they are working to upgrade it ASAP. Hopefully they
> will end that soon.
>
> Aside from that, we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must
> ease activities managem
No yet. But I know they are working to upgrade it ASAP. Hopefully they will
end that soon.
Aside from that, we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must
ease activities management, for both image builders and developers. I will
be helping on that.
On May 12, 2017 1:25 PM, "Dave Cross
Do those xo run the latest release?
On May 12, 2017 1:01 PM, "Samuel Cantero" wrote:
> I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python codebase
> and I guess we're not the only one. We should work to find out a new
> release manager if Sam P can't make it anymore.
>
> Certainly
I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python codebase
and I guess we're not the only one. We should work to find out a new
release manager if Sam P can't make it anymore.
Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I don't
think solution is to discard al
It seems to me that the classic Sugar python codebase could be returned to
Quozl / OLPC, and Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs
Hi Samson,
Sugar barely runs on modern GNU/Linux, as it is stuck depending on old,
unsupported libraries (e.g. Collaboration is broken, TamTam doesn't
run). Important bugs go unnoticed (Browse 200 didn't launch for months
with a trivial unreported bug).
Sugar Labs is committed to releasing Sugar
20 matches
Mail list logo
