On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:37:09AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > > (oops, wrong subject)
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > This post is not about particular feature but about pr
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > (oops, wrong subject)
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
> > to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set.
>
> IMHO, ins
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> (oops, wrong subject)
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
> to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set.
IMHO, instead of proposing (apparently out of the blue) new features
that change everything
