Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

2013-05-22 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Same thing, they also have system api. On 22 May 2013 21:23, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma wrote: > >> > >> Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was wondering how many > >> of the HTML5 apps from

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

2013-05-22 Thread Sameer Verma
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma wrote: >> >> Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was wondering how many >> of the HTML5 apps from FirefoxOS would slide over to our platform with >> little change. I just got my hands on a Geeks

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

2013-05-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma wrote: > Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was wondering how many > of the HTML5 apps from FirefoxOS would slide over to our platform with > little change. I just got my hands on a Geeksphone Peak > (http://www.geeksphone.com/) and have been followi

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

2013-05-21 Thread Sameer Verma
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien wrote: >> >> Sean DALY writes: >> >> > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98. >> >> Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of >> reaching some definite level of maturity,

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

2013-05-17 Thread Manuel QuiƱones
Nice phrase Alan :) I agree with all, let's name it 1.0 . 2013/5/17 Alan Kay : > "Better" and "Perfect" are the enemies of "What Is Needed" > > > From: Walter Bender > To: Daniel Narvaez ; Sean DALY > Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing ; > "sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org