Yes the new paragraph is more reasonable:
Microsoft is now targeting governments who are purchasing XOs, in an attempt
to get them to replace the free software with Windows. It remains to be seen
to what degree Microsoft will succeed. But with all of this pressure,
Microsoft has harmed a project
Thanks to all who made the FSF change this.
- Bert -
On 02.09.2009, at 08:14, Bill Kerr wrote:
Yes the new paragraph is more reasonable:
Microsoft is now targeting governments who are purchasing XOs, in an
attempt to get them to replace the free software with Windows. It
remains to be
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Bert Freudenbergb...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Thanks to all who made the FSF change this.
- Bert -
+1
Sameer
On 02.09.2009, at 08:14, Bill Kerr wrote:
Yes the new paragraph is more reasonable:
Microsoft is now targeting governments who are purchasing XOs,
in any case, the text appears to be fixed now in a much more reasonable fashion.
bobby
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Sebastian
Silvasebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
2009/8/31 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
I don't think anyone on this list was suggesting that Windows on OLPC
was/is
http://books.google.com/books?id=WKQhFoin9J4Cpg=PA186lpg=PA186dq=%22invasi%C3%B3n+cultural%22+pablo+freiresource=blots=OwnQN4_UXSsig=79qDqo1590mxNTbOwbQnWNZO3sMhl=esei=SB2cSuHyI4mwtgflpp3WBAsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum=6#v=onepageq=f=false
Heya,
Sorry for the cross post but I felt the need to
I don't think anyone on this list was suggesting that Windows on OLPC
was/is a good/appropriate solution for learning. But there is a free
software alternative, Sugar, that is designed to be appropriated by
the local community/culture. We were asking, why doesn't the FSF
promote alternatives
2009/8/31 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
I don't think anyone on this list was suggesting that Windows on OLPC
was/is a good/appropriate solution for learning. But there is a free
software alternative, Sugar, that is designed to be appropriated by
the local community/culture. We were
