On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:48 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
The strongest argument against is that any easily administered testing is
biased towards lower level skills (as defined in Bloom's taxonomy). That
would be OK, depending on how the data is used. Any attempt to modify
teaching in
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Caroline Meeks
carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Maria Droujkova droujk...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:48 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
The strongest argument against is that any easily administered
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Maria Droujkova droujk...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Caroline Meeks
carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Maria Droujkova droujk...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:48 AM,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:12, Caroline Meeks
carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
This is a simple, yet powerful idea of tracking student progress in real
time and trying different interventions to see what works.
I give a brief three minute description
here:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:34, Kevin Cole dc.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:12, Caroline Meeks
carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
This is a simple, yet powerful idea of tracking student progress in real
time and trying different interventions to see what works.
I give a brief
This is a simple, yet powerful idea of tracking student progress in real
time and trying different interventions to see what works.
I give a brief three minute description here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI95fgBnJWI
There is a great deal on the web about RTI but everything I have seen in
Caroline
Thanks for bring this to my attention, you have done a good video presentation
of it. Testing (and tailoring instruction as a response) is coming back into
fashion in Australia. Australia seems to lag the US in this.
The US has had the No Child Left Behind for a while now, which has
