Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-19 Thread Samson Goddy
...@gmail.com To: d...@lab6.com Subject: Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes CC: la...@somosazucar.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org Well, Google is really one of the biggest non-free software vendors today, so saying yes to google and no to microsoft is very silly. Also

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-19 Thread Sam Parkinson
Well, Google is really one of the biggest non-free software vendors today, so saying yes to google and no to microsoft is very silly. Also, organisations are big. Google makes Google Classroom and Google Apps for Education ("GAFE"), yet still the OSPO gives SL funds. Thanks, Sam On Sun,

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Dave Crossland
On 19 July 2016 at 00:24, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Donations will be recognized separately. Except the appear not to be, per https://www.debian.org/donations#donors ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 18/07/16 a las 22:56, Dave Crossland escribió: > I think the way the FSF and Debian handle sponsorship is good. Sure. > > The FSF shows Google, IBM and HP logos on https://www.fsf.org/patrons "The FSF does not endorse the activities of its patrons." > > Debian shows HP logo on

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Dave Crossland
On 18 July 2016 at 23:15, Sebastian Silva wrote: > El 18/07/16 a las 19:55, Laura Vargas escribió: > > How does Google resonate with SL values more than Microsoft? > They should mean the same really. I see nothing wrong with accepting > their funds. > > That doesn't

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 18/07/16 a las 19:55, Laura Vargas escribió: > How does Google resonate with SL values more than Microsoft? They should mean the same really. I see nothing wrong with accepting their funds. That doesn't mean that we endorse technology that doesn't respect a user's rights. In fact -

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Dave Crossland
On 18 July 2016 at 20:55, Laura Vargas wrote: > "Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it > universally accessible and useful." > > This can be done with 100% free/libre software: no conflict with SL active > members values. > Microsoft's

Re: [IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-18 Thread Laura Vargas
Hi Dave, "Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful." This can be done with 100% free/libre software: no conflict with SL active members values. Regards, Laura V 2016-07-16 10:56 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland : > > Hi Laura

[IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-15 Thread Laura Vargas
As of today, July 15 please find saved Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes below. So far, the main strategy is to share, prioritize, fund and execute, a " curated participatory portafolio of projects and project ideas" related to the support and expansion of the Sugar