On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Fedora is still a Red Hat trademark.
>
> That leaves Red Hat at least somewhat legally responsible.
>
> The CLA has caused serious heartburn for some (e.g. Bert Freudenburg)
> and I've been on his side in that (because the issues he sees could have
> appli
Fedora is still a Red Hat trademark.
That leaves Red Hat at least somewhat legally responsible.
The CLA has caused serious heartburn for some (e.g. Bert Freudenburg)
and I've been on his side in that (because the issues he sees could have
applied to me in previous years). RH/Fedora is revising t
Chris Ball wrote:
>> Most project have some sort of agreement.
>
> Citation? Many of the largest free software projects in existence
> have no such thing -- GNOME, Ubuntu, the Linux kernel -- and each
> has widespread ties with all kinds of businesses.
Ubuntu has the Code of Conduit, which you
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 01:33 +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:06:12PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> > > > What's the Individual Contributor Agreement, and why would we want one
> > > > of those? Communities should wait until they get large before they
> > > > start ins
> I'm struck by the disconnect between Greg's advice of "let anyone who
> says they want to be a member be a member" and this new "let anyone who
> enters into a legal agreement with us be a member"; my intuition sides
> on the relaxed side of the continuum.
On the other hand, isn't this exactly w
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:06:12PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> > > What's the Individual Contributor Agreement, and why would we want one
> > > of those? Communities should wait until they get large before they
> > > start instituting bureaucracy that turns their potential new members
> > >
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 01:10 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:38:45PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> >> An Individual member is someone who has made a significant and sustained
> >> c
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:38:45PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> An Individual member is someone who has made a significant and sustained
>> contribution to the Sugar Labs ecosystem -- of any type -- and who has
>> ex
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:38:45PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
> An Individual member is someone who has made a significant and sustained
> contribution to the Sugar Labs ecosystem -- of any type -- and who has
> explicitly agreed to the Individual Contributor Agreement.
What's the Individual
> Although it is difficult to specify a precise definition
[snipped]
This creates ambiguity. If it doesn't add to the process, I suggest we
remove it altogether.
Sameer
--
Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Systems
San Francisco State University
San Francisco CA 94132 US
Here is a draft of the Individual Membership Guideline base on the
feedback received over the last few days.
Dfarning
---
An Individual member is someone who has made a significant and sustained
contribution to the Sugar Labs e
11 matches
Mail list logo
