This was posted to the Linux Users of Victoria mailing list today. I've anonymised the post... but thought it might be food for thought in the twilight of 2009.
- Donna ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am 34. I went through a terrible period in computer education. The first computer that I saw was in 1987 [from memory an Apple 2e at school] in year 7. I left school in 1992 knowing absolutely nothing about computers - nada, zippo, zilch. I didn't know where the on button was. I couldn't insert a disk [which was a floppy back then]. Yet I had been at a school for 6 years with stacks of computers that were, for that time, good computers - mainly IBM clones since apples were only in the year 7 section for some reason. I had tried to learn. But in the final analysis school utterly failed my technological needs. The reasons for this were complex. There were qualified computer teachers. But in the main they were not used. Rather, incidental teaching of computers was the norm such as an English teacher teaching word processing, or, to be more accurate failing to teach anything. I remember my English teacher saying to us on year 12 "you are all using computers as glorified typewriters" meaning that nobody was cut/pasting. In truth nobody had learnt how to cut or paste. There were issues of room layout/architecture such as the computers being at the sides of the room, not leaving room to use a mouse. So I never saw a mouse in my entire school life. Yet the worst aspect of it all - the worst of all possible worlds - was that it was assumed that I was learning about computers when I wasn't learning a thing. For instance there was that dreadful Australian Studies unit that was compulsory and the teacher said "I want to everyone to print out their final assignment on a computer". I had no clue. So I got a mate to do it for me. Thus I learnt nothing. It is cute how outcomes in computer illiteracy are very analogous to issues in alphabetical illiteracy. Then I failed a year 12 maths unit called Reasoning and Data. It was assumed that I knew how to use a spreadsheet and use minitab. I didn't have a clue how to type on the keyboard. And as usual I got no help from the teacher. For practical ends he was no teacher; he was as bad as an administrator. I would have been better off with maths and computers had I been in year 12 in 1980. At least then issues were clearcut. People didn't assume that you knew how to use a computer. You were not assumed to have a PC at home [I didn't.] And in maths A/B I would have had Pascal in the back of the textbook. Maths A/B was ahead of its time. The idea of combining maths/computing at year 12 was not new despite the pseudo-revolutionaries of the VCE trying to tell you that it was. IMO Reasoning and Data was a major step backwards. I have the deepest jealously of people who learn computers at school now. It was an utter failure for me. -- Donna Benjamin - Executive Director Creative Contingencies - http://cc.com.au ph +61 3 9326 9985 - mob +61 418 310 414 open source - facilitation - web services _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep